{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-07b7650796bf",
  "docSlug": "3d4b6bddba27",
  "documentTitle": "Health Management Associates (HMA)",
  "authorId": "12_Glenview",
  "authorName": "Larry Robbins",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2013-08-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.2941177,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 22,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 5,
  "notes": "Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the deficiencies of the incumbent board against the proposed alternative.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-07b7650796bf/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-07b7650796bf",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-07b7650796bf.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-07b7650796bf#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "For these reasons, we believe that the odds that non-Glenview shareholders support a combination of HMA and Community are increased by changing the Board",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a85f1922-f0f6-40cc-954f-216174454218",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA decline: 9%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-fb91-749f-a6b8-f2d0e9e48cea",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1 2013 based on the midpoint of HMA's guidance ranges provided in July 30, 2013 filing. 2 Per HMA's Board presentation, 'Creating Shareholder Value', filed July 31, 2013, p. 15",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b623aee4-da5d-46aa-856e-17079605cd2d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table with columns 'Under Sitting Board' and 'Fresh Alternative' and rows for Financial Health, Regulatory Challenges, and Strategic Alternatives.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9e81e406-8924-4dec-80f0-720fea3bb4ec",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The August Vote: A Comparison of Results & Capabilities of Each Board",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e06137bf-d336-4d84-a673-5ea053678a92",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "contrast-pairs",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "a6eac0c7-6ed9-45d7-bcb3-b9898a4c7a9c",
      "evidence": "Side-by-side comparison of incumbent vs alternative board attributes.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "430a08e6-8dfb-4734-b4b7-4ad5a1f4700f",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by highlighting the consequences of inaction and the risks of not changing the board.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "8a6088cc-0e6d-4b89-ad3a-7729ffd49e3b",
      "evidence": "The document highlights the costs of inaction and the risks of not changing the board.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To highlight the costs of not changing the board",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}