{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-bbda13f8f3bc",
  "docSlug": "d91e668c0a36",
  "documentTitle": "Epiq Systems, Inc. (EPIQ)",
  "authorId": "07_Marcato",
  "authorName": "Marcato",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2016-04-06 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 4,
  "pageCount": 13,
  "prevPage": 3,
  "nextPage": 5,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 32,
  "notes": "The slide uses parentheses to denote negative returns or underperformance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-bbda13f8f3bc/4",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-bbda13f8f3bc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-bbda13f8f3bc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-bbda13f8f3bc#slide-4",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "By any objective measure, over any relevant time period and against any pertinent benchmark, Epiq has significantly underperformed",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-3f40-73bb-a616-db25e3e7c561",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Total Shareholder Returns: (62.6%)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-3f40-73bb-a616-dfac6117af1e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "By any objective measure, over any relevant time period and against any pertinent benchmark, Epiq has significantly underperformed",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4694633e-fdf1-4290-bf78-8afbcf7a0f33",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "(1) As of April 6, 2016 (2) Peers include ACIW, EPAY, CBR, CTG, CLGX, CRD.B, EEFT, FICO, FCN, NCI, HURN, MMS",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "def5494f-6577-4c62-a637-872de43a41d6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Total Shareholder Returns table comparing Epiq Systems to Russell 3000 and Proxy Peers across 1, 3, 5, and 10 years.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "07455845-1555-4997-8c64-45753209b56c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "PERSISTENT LONG-TERM SHARE PRICE UNDERPERFORMANCE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ec472b8a-28de-4ba4-8a66-78505870b208",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "c50c41c8-9bf6-4287-b85e-6e7cc19a738d",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of company performance against benchmarks and peers.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "74467de8-0e61-4fb9-93c7-e3fa4d74e66e",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "The Monster",
      "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster",
      "evidence": "The document presents the company's failures, including persistent long-term share price underperformance, failed capital allocation, and poor operating performance.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Hook",
      "parentBeatSlug": "hook"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "David Goliath",
      "slug": "16-david-goliath",
      "bestFor": "Startups, disruptive innovation, competitive displacement",
      "matchId": "890f3863-ef9d-48ab-9dd8-2dda87068154",
      "evidence": "The document presents Marcato as a champion of shareholder value, opposing the entrenched board and management.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To present Marcato as a champion of shareholder value, opposing the entrenched board and management",
      "structure": "The Giant's Weakness -> Our Slingshot (Unique Edge) -> The Topple",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Frame your initiative as the nimble underdog taking on a slow, bloated incumbent"
    },
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "793e3a75-e49f-4da2-9168-a0fa44d88f77",
      "evidence": "The document presents the cost of inaction and the need for a board change to drive management accountability and maximize shareholder value.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To highlight the cost of inaction and the need for a board change",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}