{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5",
  "docSlug": "96abbaf09d0b",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-21 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 37,
  "pageCount": 87,
  "prevPage": 36,
  "nextPage": 38,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to present evidence of financial reporting manipulation.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "numbered_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5/37",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5#slide-37",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont lacks a consistent reporting methodology for M&A activity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-203c-716b-be61-f3220aa9106d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.76
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Company Press Releases, SEC Filings, 2006 Data Book, Q3 2013 presentation. (1)-(7) Detailed footnotes explaining the specific accounting adjustments and data sources.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7a44cf99-73d3-4cbc-9ca6-d1096cfb92dc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "1. DuPont “shuffles the deck chairs” with operating segments\n2. DuPont “shuffles the deck chairs” with the historical income statements\n3. Management stopped reporting new product cannibalization entirely in 2007\n4. DuPont lacks a consistent reporting methodology for M&A activity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "numbered",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "de8831af-507d-4010-9fd3-2e65aea01f32",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Lack Of Transparency In Reporting",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3d6b22cf-0e74-479d-aa4d-6b1ff08e727a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "fraud-exposure",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "37e469b3-dc78-4317-bcc2-87a070c6143d",
      "evidence": "The slide systematically lists accounting inconsistencies to argue for management obfuscation.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "0a8a3a82-fba6-4f03-a8cb-8990128795d2",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of DuPont's underperformance and poor governance, including lack of transparency and value destruction.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 21,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "3b4504be-7163-472d-958e-55a976db9700",
      "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the negative consequences of DuPont's underperformance and poor governance.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Highlight the consequences of not taking action",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}