{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5",
  "docSlug": "96abbaf09d0b",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-21 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 20,
  "pageCount": 87,
  "prevPage": 19,
  "nextPage": 21,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded bar chart approach to contrast DuPont (red) with peer benchmarks (blue/grey).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5/20",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-96363f3635d5#slide-20",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont’s EBITDA margins have lagged peers in 5 of 7 segments (~64% of revenues)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-203c-716b-be60-5abff5d2cbb3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "EBITDA margin comparison charts for 5 segments",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "082113eb-9094-44ec-9633-fe6924135cfc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: SEC filings and Wall Street research. EBITDA includes a portion of unallocated corporate costs...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d1dd5bca-0d9b-4db3-bd11-1d14b13126b7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA margin: 64%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-203c-716b-be60-5d93f274ec36",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "DuPont's EBITDA margins have lagged peers in 5 of 7 segments (~64% of revenues)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "eb13d01d-2b95-42d9-a3e0-789b94efca36",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Why DuPont Underperformed: Failure To Deliver Peer Level Margins",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "df86f59b-066f-49bc-be54-9435c22621f1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "16890fc3-ee14-47f5-b89e-bfd35fbe42b3",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of DuPont margins vs peer benchmarks",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "815c4657-dacb-4824-9e3d-5f34a6a8a191",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
      "evidence": "The deck identifies DuPont's underperformance and various issues, such as lack of growth and poor governance.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Iceberg",
      "slug": "10-iceberg",
      "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change",
      "matchId": "9bde39d3-2792-47e1-b94e-1ea5ed3b8bf2",
      "evidence": "The deck uses various slides to expose contradictions and highlight DuPont's underperformance.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Reveal the underlying issues at DuPont",
      "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}