{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-91fb14eb885a",
  "docSlug": "7fff9fc593d2",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Trian Partners",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-17 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 21,
  "pageCount": 45,
  "prevPage": 20,
  "nextPage": 22,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "Uses a waterfall-style logic to show EBITDA growth and cost allocation discrepancies.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-91fb14eb885a/21",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-91fb14eb885a",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-91fb14eb885a.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-91fb14eb885a#slide-21",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.72
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont transferred >$6bn of shareholder wealth to private equity owners by not running Coatings efficiently and selling the business for cash rather than doing a tax-free spin. We estimate that consolidated DuPont is burdened by $2-$4bn of excess corporate costs.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2d8101e3-50b7-412f-8bce-216f694ff17c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont transferred >$6bn of shareholder wealth to private equity owners by not running Coatings efficiently and selling the business for cash rather than doing a tax-free spin",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-14d8-75c0-8c79-7eccf535e22b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "EBITDA comparison chart showing DuPont vs Axalta performance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1825949e-6b9d-4f73-acba-3368aba7ec73",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "In 2012, DuPont announced the sale of Coatings to private equity buyers. At the time, Coatings generated $339m of EBITDA. Today, that same business, renamed Axalta, generates $851m of EBITDA. In 2014, the new owners filed a Form S-1 to take Axalta public. The S-1 disclosed that Pro Forma EBITDA in 2011 was $568m, $229m higher than originally reported by DuPont in the same year – this implies that DuPont burdened the Coatings segment with $229m of excess corporate costs.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1ec674c0-19c4-4b3a-92a5-54a6bee9436e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA: $851m",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-14d8-75c0-8c79-828bfaef64c1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: DuPont and Axalta SEC Filings.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "688bd2fa-e38f-4ca8-a43d-2dc64686a76a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Excess Corporate Costs: The Coatings Case Study",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6c5fa960-3f02-451e-a946-c19181fc6819",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "fraud-exposure",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "6a35d6e3-3157-454e-a92c-13a1250f68e7",
      "evidence": "Exposing discrepancy between reported EBITDA and S-1 filings to prove corporate mismanagement.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 24,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "ac78e74d-518f-4088-b7c1-135cb63969a2",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by highlighting the CEO's contradictions, the company's failures, and the negative consequences of these issues.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}