{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8db9eda08bf8",
  "docSlug": "80938ee8f28c",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-22 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.2631578,
  "pageNumber": 20,
  "pageCount": 88,
  "prevPage": 19,
  "nextPage": 21,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 11,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparison frame to highlight underperformance in specific business units.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8db9eda08bf8/20",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8db9eda08bf8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8db9eda08bf8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8db9eda08bf8#slide-20",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont’s EBITDA margins have lagged peers in 5 of 7 segments (~64% of revenues)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-14d8-75c0-8c7d-f243191dbb83",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.26
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "EBITDA margin comparison across segments",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0d41b224-276e-43c4-9ac4-d731dde89ae2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA margin: 64%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-14d8-75c0-8c7d-f593b3292c87",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.73
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: SEC filings and Wall Street research. EBITDA includes a portion of unallocated corporate costs...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "31e09b69-3ec9-417b-8ef7-ab602f30f591",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "DuPont's EBITDA margins have lagged peers in 5 of 7 segments (~64% of revenues)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ff46525a-166c-4818-aadb-e25771dd1134",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Why DuPont Underperformed: Failure To Deliver Peer Level Margins",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f11361e4-e4f0-4ec8-81b8-5a41470a25cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "70cbc15b-ca42-4434-b069-a30bdaf6f579",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of DuPont margins vs peers to highlight underperformance.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "c6182c7d-251a-4039-b236-d1b4e6da34b3",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Complication",
      "beatSlug": "complication",
      "evidence": "DuPont's track record of underperformance",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Iceberg",
      "slug": "10-iceberg",
      "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change",
      "matchId": "5a6c2ff7-636a-4d16-ad24-7656376c03f6",
      "evidence": "Exposing contradictions in DuPont's strategy and performance",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Reveal DuPont's underperformance",
      "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}