{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8b78bf0b9787",
  "docSlug": "f7ee8aae1c88",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Trian Partners",
  "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
  "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-13 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 10,
  "pageCount": 12,
  "prevPage": 9,
  "nextPage": 11,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a series of bar charts to illustrate the 'before and after' of corporate cost allocation.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8b78bf0b9787/10",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8b78bf0b9787",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8b78bf0b9787.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8b78bf0b9787#slide-10",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.68
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont transferred ~$7bn of shareholder wealth to private equity owners by not running Coatings efficiently and selling the business for cash rather than doing a tax-free spin. We estimate that consolidated DuPont is burdened by $2-$4 bn of excess corporate costs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0f3a1556-4033-4c4a-8057-5769084da7be",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont transferred ~$7bn of shareholder wealth to private equity owners by not running Coatings efficiently and selling the business for cash rather than doing a tax-free spin",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b5-7512-b5bb-a2b3f3a1b9bb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.32,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "EBITDA comparison charts showing growth under DuPont vs. new owners",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a30f3a24-dcd9-4435-bd3a-025e7627f1d0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "In 2012, DuPont announced the sale of Coatings to private equity buyers. At the time, Coatings generated $339m of EBITDA. Today, that same business, renamed Axalta, generates $851m of EBITDA, an improvement of >150%. In 2014, the new owners filed a Form S-1 to take Axalta public. The S-1 disclosed that Pro Forma EBITDA in 2011 was $568m, $229m higher than originally reported by DuPont in the same year – this implies that DuPont burdened the Coatings segment with $229m of excess corporate costs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "198303a5-2645-49ec-a534-a6153249e90f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA: $229m",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-78b5-7512-b5bb-a7c43c21a721",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.79
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: DuPont and Axalta SEC Filings. (1)-(5) Footnotes detailing EBITDA calculation methodology.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e4067921-7341-4705-ab07-3e217a9b32b5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Excess Corporate Costs: The Coatings Case Study",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "63dfb6dc-5f6a-4a8a-8a0a-20e85c42dbde",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "before-after-framing",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "5be36e27-2af5-490a-b970-44c080222e78",
      "evidence": "The slide contrasts EBITDA performance under DuPont vs. new owners to imply mismanagement.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 12,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "e98122d4-48f9-428d-a2c4-6c09b16121c4",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Expose contradiction",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Slides 6-12 present a series of contradictions and criticisms of DuPont's strategy and performance.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Zoom In",
      "slug": "06-zoom-in",
      "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
      "matchId": "626004a7-2155-4ba3-ac50-b54bd46e617d",
      "evidence": "Slide 10 presents a case study of excessive corporate costs in the coatings business.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the specific areas where DuPont's costs are excessive?",
      "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
    },
    {
      "to": 12,
      "from": 8,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "9614840c-3032-46a2-90df-799530290a7c",
      "evidence": "Slides 8-12 present a series of criticisms of DuPont's strategy and performance, implying a cost of inaction.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing DuPont's complex operations and high corporate costs?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}