{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4",
  "docSlug": "61f9ed76fe8f",
  "documentTitle": "The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2017-09-06 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 69,
  "pageCount": 94,
  "prevPage": 68,
  "nextPage": 70,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 14,
  "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to highlight the digital presence gap between P&G and its competitors.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph",
    "callout_box",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4/69",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4#slide-69",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "It is critical that P&G dedicate more resources, rather than cut digital spending as it did in Q4 2017, to contemporize marketing. If money in one area is ineffective, it should be reinvested elsewhere to drive growth",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6ca886cc-1633-4e4b-8cc7-c22037dbfd8e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "P&G Digital Presence in Key Brands Lags vs. Smaller, New and Traditional Competitors (Instagram followers)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "49b3819c-5aab-4320-8431-106739609a8c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.97
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Instagram as of September 5, 2017.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "269de029-ff2d-40bd-a80c-44ee04a91c28",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Small Brand / New Competitor | P&G Brand | Traditional Competitor",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e0017e74-e024-47f1-a86e-0c9948abb6b0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Small companies are better at using the internet to build brands despite fewer resources. P&G must bring on more talent from the outside with modern marketing expertise to complement core competencies in traditional brand building.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6554abff-5c23-44fc-b320-cc19024d8c3a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Instagram followers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0934-771a-b79f-b0ec14ccb61b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Small Competitors Are Doing More with Less in Digital & Social",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ef70077b-621d-42a0-aa0d-991bb1f28880",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "d7830fcb-70ca-4c30-a4ad-baf56f9551ff",
      "evidence": "The slide mentions a comparison between small companies and P&G, with a chart showing 'P&G Digital Presence in Key Brands Lags vs. Smaller, New and Traditional Competitors'",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "928125c1-b7d1-4f60-ae58-28f6f912754e",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a bar chart to compare digital presence across different brands",
      "confidence": 0.6
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "f2887479-f2de-45c6-9dd9-13912e29a43c",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of P&G vs competitors across categories",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}