{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4",
  "docSlug": "61f9ed76fe8f",
  "documentTitle": "The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2017-09-06 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 62,
  "pageCount": 94,
  "prevPage": 61,
  "nextPage": 63,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "callout_box",
    "comparison_table",
    "logo_grid",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4/62",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4#slide-62",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Big brands like P&G's that sell at high prices face increased risk of commoditization, particularly as competitors innovate with technologies and marketing strategies targeted at millennials, specialty channels, local consumers, etc.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8154e13c-3405-4b48-9353-d7ce62a655de",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Big brands like P&G’s that sell at high prices face increased risk of commoditization, particularly as competitors innovate with technologies and marketing strategies targeted at millennials, specialty channels, local consumers, etc.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0934-771a-b79f-1b09453663a6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "market share change: -1,250 bps",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0934-771a-b79f-1c0e5ea54e41",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.97
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Euromonitor International Limited 2017 ©.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "92d0adab-3a94-4b44-af74-0afebc23ae8e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Market share change data for U.S. Hair Care, U.S. Men's Shave, U.S. Oral Care, and China Diapers comparing P&G brands to competitors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0f6f866b-ccde-460f-8b37-93a102a56ae5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "P&G Must Learn to Play the \"Small\" and \"Local\" Game",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7b655bb4-a45d-4a54-8671-d9da9961e6e6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "e3cd3e01-a8b0-4a4d-a74e-c723fcfa0244",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of market share performance between incumbent and challenger brands.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}