{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4",
  "docSlug": "61f9ed76fe8f",
  "documentTitle": "The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2017-09-06 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 46,
  "pageCount": 94,
  "prevPage": 45,
  "nextPage": 47,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a contrast-pair framework to argue for organizational restructuring.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4/46",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-5b8745c248b4#slide-46",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Creates \"no place to hide\" dynamic as GBU leaders will produce strong results or be replaced",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-0934-771a-b79d-e6838149c73a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Comparison of Proposed Structure vs Current Matrix",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2c21ff2e-e533-4ed8-a37e-40e1c891b81e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.8,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison of Proposed Structure vs Current Matrix across four key dimensions: accountability, local competition, bureaucracy, and synergy optimization.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "43b525b7-75b2-4e3a-95a5-a5bc821b359e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Proposed Structure Has Numerous Advantages Over Current Matrix",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6b47c023-c05b-44df-aa93-a5b9feaf9b4b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "19f74796-aca2-44ce-891f-83bbd1307e5c",
      "evidence": "framework/instance: Comparison of Proposed Structure vs Current Matrix",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8e0845a7-580f-4d9a-85ea-f54ed31f646e",
      "evidence": "Side-by-side comparison of two organizational models with contrasting pros and cons.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}