{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-516972bd61b4",
  "docSlug": "8aba66576764",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-21 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 20,
  "pageCount": 87,
  "prevPage": 19,
  "nextPage": 21,
  "slideType": "peer_gap",
  "function": "expose_gap",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The slide uses a red-vs-blue color coding to visually emphasize the gap between DuPont (red) and its peers (blue/grey).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-516972bd61b4/20",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-516972bd61b4",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-516972bd61b4.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-516972bd61b4#slide-20",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "DuPont’s EBITDA margins have lagged peers in 5 of 7 segments (~64% of revenues)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-1ac2-71b6-bf3d-d7adc48fbc0b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Segment margin comparisons",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e2812c72-39af-4b3f-bb39-4da671aa2279",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: SEC filings and Wall Street research. EBITDA includes a portion of unallocated corporate costs...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "728e73f8-db44-42a9-aa68-1d97e73cc944",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "DuPont's EBITDA margins have lagged peers in 5 of 7 segments (~64% of revenues)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5771c29f-23a7-4767-8434-7d16df810364",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA margin: 64%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-1ac2-71b6-bf3d-db6b7e83e3cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Why DuPont Underperformed: Failure To Deliver Peer Level Margins",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1b28a66b-dbc6-4938-9000-386f2c28a407",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "e97dbbd7-b40f-4914-ac21-255559992929",
      "evidence": "Direct side-by-side margin comparison between DuPont and peers",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "0ec5af30-7142-407e-a136-80f18cd0f546",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "The Problem",
      "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster",
      "evidence": "Slides expose DuPont's track record of underperformance and contradictions in their strategy",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Hook",
      "parentBeatSlug": "hook"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 10,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "27897068-4b38-4adc-a35f-3f56744acf18",
      "evidence": "Slides 10-20 expose contradictions and underperformance",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Identify patterns of underperformance at DuPont",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}