{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228",
  "docSlug": "e685a047c782",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-02-17 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 95,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 32,
  "notes": "The slide uses red highlighting to draw attention to DuPont's poor performance relative to peers.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.52
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "DuPont EPS Growth vs. Diversified Industrials And Chemicals Peers (2011 – 2013)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4ce7ba5e-722f-4a29-9d48-746a03dea0ba",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "DuPont EPS Growth vs. DuPont Proxy Peers (2011 – 2013)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8e5d8065-b208-417e-8a5e-2cb9c562e41e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EPS growth: -10%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5374-767b-b3bf-f7d642e78c0a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.87
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "(1) Note: 2013 chosen as ending date for EPS growth comparison, as a significant portion of peers have not yet filed annual reports / Form 10-K's for 2014, which are necessary to make non-operating pension / OPEB (other post-employment benefits) adjustments for comparability with DuPont.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "367f70dd-f6ef-41a7-b3d7-ca33e69ba781",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "DuPont's EPS Growth Since 2011 Is Bottom Quartile, Regardless Of The Peer Group",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "48de017c-a241-4235-abf4-1f4d434192b3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Slide recipe: the peer-gap chart",
      "slug": "peer-gap-chart-recipe",
      "agent": "designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6d3c95de-8340-4f60-a41a-71427fd14b59",
      "evidence": "peer_benchmark chart type with DuPont EPS Growth vs. Diversified Industrials And Chemicals Peers (2011 – 2013) and DuPont EPS Growth vs. DuPont Proxy Peers (2011 – 2013)",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "9900ca5d-72b6-41b2-a9c6-3d82f03a3149",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of DuPont against two distinct peer groups to establish underperformance.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 1,
      "beatId": "d7fceecf-0bfd-4ef4-ae40-06a88df4004e",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
      "evidence": "The presentation identifies DuPont's underperformance and the problems with management.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}