{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228",
  "docSlug": "e685a047c782",
  "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Nelson Peltz",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-02-17 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 37,
  "pageCount": 95,
  "prevPage": 36,
  "nextPage": 38,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "Uses a three-column comparison structure to highlight historical inaccuracy of incumbent board rhetoric.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "subtitle_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228/37",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-4e5c6908a228#slide-37",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In fact, many of the company’s allegations almost exactly match what Heinz said about Trian in 2006 – allegations that were proven wrong over time",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5374-767b-b3c3-19b2e7be72e9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Comparison of DuPont's current claims vs. historical Heinz claims and outcomes",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3adbfa0c-df33-4a2b-972c-045f74f7ebe0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Since Trian went public with our slate, DuPont has espoused the same rhetoric typical of contested elections. In fact, many of the company’s allegations almost exactly match what Heinz said about Trian in 2006 – allegations that were proven wrong over time",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b90dac70-9910-4cf9-95c9-d7c7e93dc0c4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "\"Trian has chosen this path [a proxy contest] with the potential to disrupt our Company at a key stage of execution against our plan\" — DuPont Press Release, 1/8/15; \"Trian's presence on the Board will create substantial risk in Heinz's ability to deliver value to all shareholders\" — Heinz (6/06); \"I said to another CEO that if I were to form a board today, Nelson [Peltz] would be one of the first directors I'd ask to serve... [Trian's] team had good questions and good suggestions.\" — Bill Johnson, CEO Magazine (3/08)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5374-767b-b3c3-1e7564e1568a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.89
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: Bloomberg, DuPont and Heinz press releases and transcripts, H.J. Heinz Company SEC filings and H.J. Heinz Corporation II SEC filings. Trian is Trian's any proxy contest (2006), which ISS labeled a \"milestone proxy fight\". See ISS M&A Insight H.J. Heinz Co. Note dated September 11, 2006 and WSJ article as of October 9, 2006 \"Bigger Than They Look: How can investors with small stakes have such an impact in proxy fights?\"",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "072b8d98-55d1-45ca-ad9a-568f88b74bd0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.88,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "DuPont Claims (2014/2015) | Heinz Claims (2006) | Heinz Reality Looking Back",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c9cfacd2-982a-48fc-a998-c2ad5d2c0b8c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Did DuPont Learn Anything From Heinz?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a66b7c01-36f6-436e-b3d6-0983ff261303",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "171535dd-add7-4180-a691-ebe4159d7d96",
      "evidence": "Three-column table comparing claims and reality",
      "confidence": 1
    },
    {
      "name": "expose_contradiction",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "40abf8d5-f6a8-4291-b31c-451fa677cae3",
      "evidence": "Directly contrasting past failed arguments with current ones",
      "confidence": 0.95
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 30,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "e6afcb1d-79ad-40bd-b462-c4b725b508b5",
      "evidence": "The presentation highlights the costs of inaction for DuPont, including continued underperformance.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "What are the costs of inaction for DuPont?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}