{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-42fab09bc86d",
  "docSlug": "f306ccfd77a7",
  "documentTitle": "PepsiCo (PEP)",
  "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
  "authorName": "Trian Partners",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2013-07-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 36,
  "pageCount": 59,
  "prevPage": 35,
  "nextPage": 37,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a visual hierarchy to highlight 'Alternative A' as the preferred option via a callout bubble.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-42fab09bc86d/36",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-42fab09bc86d",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-42fab09bc86d.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-42fab09bc86d#slide-36",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Trian Preferred Options",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "940b8afa-cc3c-42e0-a04b-5d2a97164b90",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "2015E Implied Value Per Existing Share: $175",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-64cf-7128-a32a-3d89fef8144f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "(1) Trian calculations based on assumptions detailed on pages 48, 56,and 59 (2) Creates two less attractive acquisition candidates / merger partners...",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fb027b19-a6b2-4cb6-81c8-f0f9217138c1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of strategic alternatives A, B-1, B-2, B-3 across metrics like Implied Value, Capital Return, Flexibility, Synergies, Cost Savings, and Dis-Synergies.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "596e5b17-e3d6-4137-a4d0-78e401fd8880",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Trian Does Not Believe Status Quo Is A Viable Long-Term Option: Recommended Alternatives To Unlock Value",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b323905e-0216-462e-ad51-95fe2b719d42",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "7b21c633-2361-47dd-ab34-e8e5ec03539f",
      "evidence": "Trian proposes specific structural alternatives to unlock value, with 'Alternative A' (merger/separation) identified as the preferred option.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "7b983063-838b-4298-8ab6-0b1a63fb3b30",
      "evidence": "Table comparing strategic alternatives across multiple quantitative and qualitative criteria.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 59,
      "from": 25,
      "beatId": "a7b0e30d-20b3-4240-a09b-2497aa6acb9b",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Solution",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
      "evidence": "Slides 25-59 present the proposed solution",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.9,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 59,
      "from": 26,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "efc95e7b-f645-4275-a8e6-eca2b777e397",
      "evidence": "The document presents a clear contrast between current and proposed structures",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Presenting a better future through separation or merger",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}