{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7dbcf853259c",
  "docSlug": "382e24b30fef",
  "documentTitle": "Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK)",
  "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
  "authorName": "Starboard Value",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2024-08-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 42,
  "pageCount": 88,
  "prevPage": 41,
  "nextPage": 43,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a peer benchmark to justify a specific cost-cutting target of 300bps.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7dbcf853259c/42",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7dbcf853259c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7dbcf853259c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-7dbcf853259c#slide-42",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "We recommend Autodesk target a minimum of 300bps reduction in G&A spend as a percentage of revenue, which represents approximately $165 million of potential savings.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a587ecab-1afa-429e-b514-b8deaa13a0ef",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "G&A Expense as a Percentage of Sales",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "247f4f0a-3104-49ea-8839-488924793935",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Capital IQ, Bloomberg, and public company filings. Note: Represents latest fiscal year financials as of July 29, 2024...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8bf430a8-baa5-4d7d-8e0f-eca81491fb3d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "G&A expense as a percentage of sales: 9%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-fb8f-761b-afc7-ad43dbc3dbf8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "We Believe There Is Also an Opportunity to Rationalize Costs in the Company's G&A Function",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c790a2ee-1caa-4019-91e6-ef633508465b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "peer_benchmark",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "05bbf295-eda7-475d-bc52-32cca7266e4e",
      "evidence": "Comparison of G&A expense ratios across a defined peer group.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 52,
      "from": 37,
      "beatId": "15923d0f-f615-49da-8ba5-41ae7a1c9187",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Propose Solution",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "The presentation proposes solutions for improving Autodesk's financial performance",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 88,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "caff0ba1-c341-428c-8bfc-3a5587038a61",
      "evidence": "The presentation highlights the consequences of not taking action to address Autodesk's underperformance",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "The cost of inaction is significant value destruction",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 52,
      "from": 37,
      "name": "Hypothesis Test",
      "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
      "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
      "matchId": "03c6ea54-4d55-4411-9dc0-4d1b533f3a37",
      "evidence": "The presentation proposes solutions for improving Autodesk's financial performance",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Test the hypothesis that Autodesk can improve its financial performance",
      "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}