{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b97bfd4efac6",
  "docSlug": "20aaef0cd1f8",
  "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
  "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
  "authorName": "Starboard Value",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2014-09-09 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 4,
  "pageCount": 6,
  "prevPage": 3,
  "nextPage": 5,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 30,
  "notes": "The slide uses a 'fully-leased' adjustment to normalize real estate ownership differences between Darden and its peers.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "subtitle_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "callout_box",
    "data_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b97bfd4efac6/4",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b97bfd4efac6",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b97bfd4efac6.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b97bfd4efac6#slide-4",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.41
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Despite high AUVs and industry leading revenue, Darden's operating performance is significantly worse than peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "98305c84-b80f-4aae-ade8-3392ffc039e3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Estimated LTM EBITDA margins on a fully-leased basis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "acaa251e-471a-4a73-a956-9ef9a6052ad3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.29
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "DRI's low fully-leased EBITDA margins reflect a bloated cost structure and poor operating performance.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "899a0a07-1cd9-4d78-98de-9a061329508d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "EBITDA margin: 7.4%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-ee3b-7248-a1a6-76a5e5f3f4ab",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Adjusting for real estate ownership, Darden's margins are significantly below peers, despite the fact that it has an enormous scale advantage and is led by Olive Garden, which should be an extremely profitable concept given its high AUVs and pasta focus.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "24111050-2f91-4485-b18e-0353625b10e4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Company filings, Capital IQ, company presentations and Green Street Advisors. Note: As of March 31, 2014...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ac51b5e2-bc96-4c11-8958-9e6506a83e2e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "2013 AUVs and LTM Revenue data for peers and Darden",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0ccbdf21-b4b9-40cb-91f9-5d8a02f0826e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.11
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Opportunities for value creation at Darden",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0d1709a4-e78d-4c1e-93c3-41e516aebe1e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "676145ce-bf3b-457f-a788-494514ed4370",
      "evidence": "Estimated LTM EBITDA margins on a fully-leased basis",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "e33790b4-7df2-43ae-97d8-f0e4713ef456",
      "evidence": "Benchmarking Darden against a peer group to highlight performance gap.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "ca0a75f3-9542-4eb0-8075-ab49a92a0f3a",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Slides 4-5 highlight opportunities for value creation",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "5c709f23-2069-4d7d-98ee-83d82ff1f206",
      "evidence": "Slides 4-5 present a peer benchmark analysis",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Identify areas for value creation",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}