{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe",
  "docSlug": "9c639b8b1898",
  "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
  "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
  "authorName": "Starboard Value",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2014-03-31 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 23,
  "pageCount": 108,
  "prevPage": 22,
  "nextPage": 24,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "This is an activist investor slide attacking corporate governance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe/23",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe#slide-23",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.62
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Rather than look out for the best interests of shareholders, it appears that Darden’s Board has taken steps to further entrench themselves.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d6c9c4d8-8a8c-4969-b53f-bb0be03ad8f0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Darden's recent Bylaw amendments underscore the Company's blatant disregard for shareholder interests.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-203e-77ad-a6a6-20993b45f94a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Gives Board broad discretion to unilaterally delay the Annual Meeting beyond October.\nMore stringent nomination notice and business proposal requirements.\nSets Orange County, FL as exclusive forum for shareholders to bring derivative suits and other claims.\nRemoves ability of shareholders to fill existing vacancies at next Annual or Special Meeting.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bcd2c846-ac9c-4f30-b61c-0f244952260c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.29
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Darden’s new Bylaw amendments serve to exacerbate Darden’s already alarming corporate governance concerns:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "16e82fa6-c9b7-4a11-892e-7506795645dc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Despite significant criticism from leading proxy advisory firms and shareholders regarding Darden’s poor governance practices, the Company has actually taken steps to further disenfranchise shareholders.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "aed3acfe-cd11-485a-ad45-059d6c1cd151",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.76
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Darden’s recent Bylaw amendments underscore the Company’s blatant disregard for shareholder interests.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc9ecc95-2636-4c28-aa60-76c9e9db78c3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The current management team and Board have a long history of disregarding shareholders’ interests (cont’d)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fa12c03b-9c6e-4601-978d-09a47fe538fd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "governance",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8c90839a-cf90-431f-8e33-8aaa5e9c92bf",
      "evidence": "The slide critiques specific corporate governance bylaws and board actions.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "def716ce-8782-4386-a34a-8053d6ddecbb",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Expose Contradiction",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "The document highlights contradictions in management's rationale for the separation, including timing and valuation concerns.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 7,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "697f8246-ade1-4a6f-ba12-b3f73423ab43",
      "evidence": "The document presents a series of logical arguments to challenge management's decision.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To question management's logic for the Red Lobster separation",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}