{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9",
  "docSlug": "b672c185ded3",
  "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
  "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2025-05-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 22,
  "pageCount": 51,
  "prevPage": 21,
  "nextPage": 23,
  "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "function": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "The slide uses a red-bordered box to highlight the specific claims being rebutted from the opponent's letter.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9/22",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-48cf2415e3d9#slide-22",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.13,
        "w": 0.74,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.56
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "From Phillips 66’s April 24 Letter: A number of Elliott’s nominees have close personal ties to Mr. Goff... these relationships call into question Elliott’s nominees’ independence.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "83a82db8-92cd-4599-8b43-d08ff517c1d2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The intensity of Phillips 66's attacks on Mr. Goff reflects extremely poorly on the Company and its Board.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-25b7-709e-b8c1-dec1c2cc2d89",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.66,
        "x": 0.17,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Phillips 66’s misleading letter veers into the realm of fiction in describing Mr. Goff as “an interested Elliott employee.”",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "af7f3db5-5d22-4f91-b327-aa7ac58c688f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.11,
        "y": 0.41
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The Company subsequently escalated these personal attacks on Mr. Goff, publicly claiming a conflict of interest where none exists, and spreading rumors that he must be receiving compensation from Elliott, which is false. It appears that the real reason Phillips 66 rebuffed Mr. Goff has nothing to do with his independence from Elliott, and everything to do with his independence from Mr. Lashier and the current Board.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9565175c-d6ec-4542-8f50-ad0414a02d9b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.11,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The intensity of Phillips 66’s attacks on Mr. Goff reflects extremely poorly on the Company and its Board. Rather than welcome the involvement and expertise of one of the energy industry’s most highly respected executives - not to mention a 30-year veteran of ConocoPhillips and a large Phillips 66 shareholder who invested $10 million of his own money in the stock - Phillips 66 greeted the news of Mr. Goff’s support for our campaign by immediately impugning his motives and questioning his integrity.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9b001626-413e-44ca-a99c-af6596eda85b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.11,
        "y": 0.71
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Again, Phillips 66’s tiresome recycling of the same conspiracy theories about Amber Energy and Mr. Goff indicate a management team and Board desperate to change the subject from their own poor performance - and the lack of independence of their own directors, including a chairman who is also the CEO and a lead “independent” director who has served for 13 years.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c5f37997-fd54-4338-a492-d149f638e799",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.11,
        "y": 0.81
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Elliott has spent considerable effort identifying fiercely independent director nominees with relevant expertise and sufficient credibility to improve the Company’s corporate governance. The fact that either Mr. Goff or Elliott knew some of these potential directors - who include seasoned energy-industry leaders - prior to this campaign should surprise no one. In fact, our confidence in our nominees comes from our prior knowledge and observation of their skills and judgment.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ce35cca2-0750-421c-8e1e-af825a36b4d2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.78,
        "x": 0.11,
        "y": 0.51
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "See also: Elliott’s April 9 and April 10 disclosures to the SEC, our April 9 press release welcoming the support of Greg Goff, and Slide 114 of our April 28 investor presentation.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d9460422-c605-4267-afdf-5ff903f7ac6f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.66,
        "x": 0.17,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "evaluation of the CITGO opportunity. There was no effort made to hide this fact from anyone.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e0818732-2108-42c5-825b-02901c08bb9c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "A number of Elliott's nominees have close personal ties to Mr. Goff, including decades of direct work experience. Much like everything related to Elliott's Amber Energy, these relationships call into question Elliott's nominees' independence. Given Amber Energy's role in the campaign against Phillips 66 and Mr. Goff's highly misleading public solicitation, should shareholders have concerns about the honesty of Elliott's disclosures or the independence of Elliott's nominees? — Phillips 66's April 24 Letter",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-25b7-709e-b8c1-e0d76c48fe14",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}