{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-d109caa80029",
  "docSlug": "8454caf552fb",
  "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
  "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "regulatory-filing",
  "documentKindLabel": "Regulatory filing",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2025-03-21 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 3,
  "pageCount": 3,
  "prevPage": 2,
  "nextPage": null,
  "slideType": "villain_critique",
  "function": "name_villain",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 3,
  "notes": "The slide uses a social media post format to present a critique of corporate strategy.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "screenshot",
    "headline_text",
    "line_chart",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-d109caa80029/3",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-d109caa80029",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-d109caa80029.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-d109caa80029#slide-3",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.83
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "It's time to consider all options at Phillips 66",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a5c4b53e-bdd5-4660-9113-ba74302e2db8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.2,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Share Price Performance vs. Refining and Midstream Peers since Elliott Letter",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6001aebc-0aeb-4643-b28d-1573e6dd0c8d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Phillips' refining and midstream businesses do not fit together. They have contrasting risk/return propositions, with weak capital returns vs. refiners and poor growth vs. midstream peers. Phillips' problems originate from its inefficient conglomerate structure.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e4674710-793a-4581-aae7-968aec89b681",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.2,
        "y": 0.76
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Bloomberg. Note: 1) Refining peers reflect Valero and Marathon; midstream peers reflect Enterprise Products, MPLX, ONEOK, and Targa. Performance since publication of Elliott letter on November 29, 2023.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9160a584-a900-4d97-b264-011616e09bef",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "PHILLIPS TRADES LIKE A REFINER, WITH NO CREDIT FOR ITS MIDSTREAM BUSINESS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c7395332-020c-4fca-b10a-188f3d28b191",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "breakup-spinoff",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "ce3c5101-43dc-429c-981f-a3d28cac26c0",
      "evidence": "Argues that refining and midstream businesses do not fit together and suggests considering all options.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 3,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "824b2092-1839-482f-a40b-40b736258402",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Evidence",
      "beatSlug": "evidence",
      "evidence": "Villain critique",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 3,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "fb80aa2f-5c9d-4054-afc7-5fc76787c232",
      "evidence": "Peer gap and villain critique",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight Phillips' underperformance",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}