{
  "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
  "docSlug": "de33cb3292ec",
  "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
  "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
  "authorName": "John Pike",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2025-02-11 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
  "pageNumber": 57,
  "pageCount": 105,
  "prevPage": 56,
  "nextPage": 58,
  "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "function": "preempt_rebuttal",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "Part of the 'STREAMLINE 66' activist campaign by Elliott Management.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c/57",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c#slide-57",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In our experience, poor performing companies commonly blame weak operating performance on asset quality when it is, in fact, driven by an ineffective operating culture.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd953-5370-75b3-9c52-b2e0711241aa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.57
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Counterpoints: Phillip's $5bn refining mid-cycle EBITDA target suggests the company agrees it should be able to achieve EBITDA per barrel parity to peers. Pre-COVID, Phillips had refining operating costs in-line with Marathon. Both Phillips' Refining and Phillips Marketing & Specialties are underperforming their respective peers.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0ee93ac2-ecbd-4bb4-aaad-5e1393c26a8d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Potential excuse: The shortfall in Phillips' refining EBITDA per barrel is due to allocating more SG&A into its refining segment than peers and/or allocating some refining earnings into its Marketing and Specialities segment",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1d917574-0a0e-4dbf-929f-b0ad4216ceff",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.37
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Counterpoints: In our experience, poor performing companies commonly blame weak operating performance on asset quality when it is, in fact, driven by an ineffective operating culture. Compared to Valero and Marathon, Phillips' refining system scale and complexity differences are relatively minimal.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2608e2c3-777d-4be2-90b2-979030a454a9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Potential excuse: Phillips' refining assets are being run optimally and any shortfall in EBITDA per barrel vs Valero and Marathon is due to structural aspects of the assets that are beyond management's control",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3e83b130-b68a-4cf3-a707-c25da80a71c3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "PHILLIPS' POTENTIAL EXCUSES FOR POOR REFINING PERFORMANCE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "06212cf8-40a3-4d6e-a763-3f00fe3143c2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "5babfd27-3bc9-477c-896b-55285cef0bc5",
      "evidence": "list/bullet: Counterpoints: Phillip's $5bn refining mid-cycle EBITDA target suggests the company agrees it should be able to achieve EBITDA per barrel parity to peers.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "preempt_rebuttal",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "3651b33e-9555-4ae5-8c42-1fd03be14ca7",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly structures arguments as 'Potential excuse' followed by 'Counterpoints'.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}