{
  "docId": "019dd923-60d0-74ee-9624-78caf87f3120",
  "docSlug": "bi-9bf29547104c1751",
  "documentTitle": "Ukraine startup Fuelfinance used this pitch deck to raise $1 million",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "Fuelfinance",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 7,
  "pageCount": 10,
  "prevPage": 6,
  "nextPage": 8,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-60d0-74ee-9624-78caf87f3120/7",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-60d0-74ee-9624-78caf87f3120",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-60d0-74ee-9624-78caf87f3120.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-60d0-74ee-9624-78caf87f3120#slide-7",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Cost: $1,999 / month",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-c0ab-717a-a225-7e2f49e8dcf0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.8,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Excel + founders / hired manager | Pilot | Fuel\nFeatures | ad-hoc | Accounting (P&L, BS, CF) Ad-hoc CFO consulting Taxes | Accounting (P&L,BS,CF) Financial Planning Plan/Fact Analysis Unit Economics KPI Dashboards\nHuman supervision | 160h+ / month | 15h / month | up to 20h / month\nCost | $14,000+ / month | $7,250 / month | $1,999 / month",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1b920bbc-2d31-4b17-8058-22cc12506566",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "COMPETITION",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a8972701-a20c-4380-97c7-591f5ddaa1fd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "22a1203e-20c0-442d-8aab-755dbb482ef3",
      "evidence": "Table comparing features, labor, and cost against competitors.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "71c8cdd7-d557-4ec0-9b55-024ca224d375",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Competition",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-competition",
      "evidence": "competitive analysis slide",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 7,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "b7d3b9b3-3ab2-4e11-8131-dc04179ce5a9",
      "evidence": "competitive analysis and market sizing suggest MECE breakdown",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "how do we break down the market",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}