{
  "docId": "019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-062653b9a1ac",
  "docSlug": "bi-35336c8b45abb80f",
  "documentTitle": "Check out the decks 4 AI startups used to raise millions from VCs",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "Qevlar AI",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.5,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 42,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a contrast-pair framework to position the company's AI solution against legacy automation.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-062653b9a1ac/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-062653b9a1ac",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-062653b9a1ac.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-605d-726d-81a4-062653b9a1ac#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Comparison of Traditional Automation vs AI SOC Analyst",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8430dd1a-5c81-458f-a3cf-79b21384fb15",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Traditional automation vs AI SOC Analyst",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b20860e8-3696-46ed-866b-ecea5737527c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Moving beyond static solutions in SOC alert investigation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "102131c3-87a0-4f39-a047-e33042dad085",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "contrast-pairs",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "334d9879-c29f-444c-a6c1-efd71afde8df",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts two approaches (Traditional vs AI) across three dimensions.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "2f558f5c-03c0-474e-808e-eb1c3070e09c",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Solution",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
      "evidence": "The solution is presented on pages 5-8",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "93a9ba7e-aecd-4d8a-a6c2-0ef577b10ea6",
      "evidence": "The loop is visible in the transition from pain points to solution",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction in SOCs",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}