{
  "docId": "019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116",
  "docSlug": "bi-7df5eb57138bf3bb",
  "documentTitle": "PunchUp Live pitch deck: How ex-Meta employees built comedy startup",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "PunchUp",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.782,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 19,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "problem_statement",
  "function": "frame_problem",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide outlines three specific structural issues causing data fragmentation for entertainers.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-7095ed598116#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.45,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Innovator’s dilemma: Social media companies, ticketing companies, etc. business models rely on keeping all data for themselves.\nFree versus Monetized content: Alternative platforms (Patreon, Moment) have revenue models based exclusively on monetized content. This creates a disincentive to supporting and promoting free content which forces fragmentation across media platforms.\nTicketing Versus Content Versus Merchandise: Currently there’s no singular place for all Entertainer-related transactions. With different platforms for ticketing, content viewing, and merchandise sales, no current platform is able to provide holistic insights and guidance into their business.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b6177563-7070-4b29-8982-6be472118387",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Entertainers lack the ability to make data driven decisions on their business due to fragmentation across platforms and misaligned data sharing incentives.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "67e127d4-99c7-4252-b827-ad7324d13aa6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "PROBLEM 2 – DATA COLLECTION",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f5942045-3162-4edb-bb91-f3ab2a5be1f1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Problem Statement Canvas",
      "slug": "problem-statement-canvas",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3d121957-8415-4314-8804-1603447d1824",
      "evidence": "This slide presents a problem statement with a clear description of the issue, aligning with the problem statement canvas tool.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Innovator's Dilemma",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "fd0c8983-c9a1-4dc3-b8e1-10a40658c7d1",
      "evidence": "Explicitly mentioned as a header for the first bullet point.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "dfe11e32-b71f-4c36-88cf-64469d25fbf6",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem",
      "evidence": "The deck presents two problem statements, highlighting the challenges of reaching fans and collecting data.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "c8a9b255-d953-4039-be79-cc8f5cf14e63",
      "evidence": "The deck presents two problem statements, highlighting the challenges of reaching fans and collecting data.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the costs of not solving the problem of reaching fans and collecting data?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}