{
  "docId": "019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-2d8cc5c23fb4",
  "docSlug": "bi-cb739356bb4e14bf",
  "documentTitle": "EdgeQ raised $51 million to build new chips for AI and edge computing",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "EdgeQ",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 2.352,
  "pageNumber": 4,
  "pageCount": 9,
  "prevPage": 3,
  "nextPage": 5,
  "slideType": "problem_statement",
  "function": "frame_problem",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a visual comparison framework to contrast three categories: Consumer, EdgeQ, and Datacenter/Telco.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "infographic",
    "process_diagram"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-2d8cc5c23fb4/4",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-2d8cc5c23fb4",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-2d8cc5c23fb4.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d2-2d8cc5c23fb4#slide-4",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.11,
        "w": 1,
        "x": 0,
        "y": 0.89
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Software defined CONNECTIVITY + COMPUTE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a1d09012-7184-4c3d-8c59-75dc069dc94e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Comparison of Consumer, EdgeQ, and Datacenter hardware architectures",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "other",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8efc417d-cdf8-4b8c-b299-963b215cd6fe",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.7
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Consumer Grade vs Telco/Enterprise Grade vs Datacenter",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2565e5c1-39b0-472d-8a9a-81e7da9b5448",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.74,
        "x": 0.13,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Traditional Datacenter-Consumer Hardware Cannot Port to the EDGE",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "89834d8c-df4a-4fc8-8f7c-ef2de0d8cd52",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Problem Statement Canvas",
      "slug": "problem-statement-canvas",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "c66110a0-5ebf-44bc-8261-c199a5ed9a19",
      "evidence": "title/headline: Traditional Datacenter-Consumer Hardware Cannot Port to the EDGE",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8b765dc3-4de3-4ecf-83eb-b79a84638071",
      "evidence": "Visual comparison of three hardware categories across performance and power dimensions.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 4,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "3a07af40-608d-4662-a903-0f2d6331bd03",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem",
      "evidence": "The problem statement is clearly presented on page 4",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 4,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "23ced7b7-6efc-45bc-a00d-2ddbec3cfc04",
      "evidence": "The problem statement implies the cost of inaction",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Cost of inaction",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}