{
  "docId": "019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-c548e6e3e697",
  "docSlug": "bi-55f5fa76bb637210",
  "documentTitle": "Complex Networks new rebranding pitch deck",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "Complex Networks",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.839,
  "pageNumber": 12,
  "pageCount": 19,
  "prevPage": 11,
  "nextPage": 13,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a high-contrast black and yellow color scheme to emphasize the #1 ranking.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "big_number",
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-c548e6e3e697/12",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-c548e6e3e697",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-c548e6e3e697.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5fec-763b-95d1-c548e6e3e697#slide-12",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Reach: 6.7 MM",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-b66a-728d-8c06-e2b825e54792",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Complex Networks 6.7 MM; Netflix 6.5 MM; Bleacher Report 3.8 MM; ESPN 3.3 MM; Hulu 2.9 MM; Vice 2.9 MM",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3ec77681-e909-4532-b746-51364eb01fe9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.8,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.68,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "#1 REACH IN M18-24",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b68c35af-3d12-40bc-83b8-28aa34908775",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "a94a7adc-f176-45e3-8151-ac8f9411fad1",
      "evidence": "table/data: Complex Networks 6.7 MM; Netflix 6.5 MM; Bleacher Report 3.8 MM; ESPN 3.3 MM; Hulu 2.9 MM; Vice 2.9 MM",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "1fe157a3-4a62-4f67-b2f5-537c8c024d5c",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of reach metrics against competitors to establish market leadership.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "b095ac48-1ace-4a9b-98ae-6c8569ec7cb3",
      "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
      "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
      "beatName": "Complication",
      "beatSlug": "complication",
      "evidence": "Competitive analysis and market position slides highlight the challenges.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 18,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "c788ad9b-0464-4b85-add9-52faabf63e2b",
      "evidence": "The deck juxtaposes the network's current achievements with its future aspirations.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Contrasting Complex Networks' current state with its future vision",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    },
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 12,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "ef954153-6ed8-43b5-8c3a-509c97a8a901",
      "evidence": "Competitive analysis and market position slides imply the consequences of inaction.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Highlighting the risks of not evolving and rebranding",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}