{
  "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-6968a83beccc",
  "docSlug": "fEdbAFEkBAFBuwkxQXoK",
  "documentTitle": "Before it was a smash hit;; clothing resale app Poshmark struggled to convince investors that mobile was the future. Here’s the original;; 2011 pitch deck that inspired one VC to bet on it.",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "Poshmark",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.299,
  "pageNumber": 12,
  "pageCount": 16,
  "prevPage": 11,
  "nextPage": 13,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The table categorizes competitors by their level of service in shipping and logistics.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-6968a83beccc/12",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-6968a83beccc",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-6968a83beccc.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9ba-6968a83beccc#slide-12",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "GoshPosh will serve as an intermediary for financial transactions, customer service, and dispute resolution",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-d062-7278-acc8-8ef9ed06aa79",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "GoshPosh will serve as an intermediary for financial transactions, customer service, and dispute resolution",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e9c98a1f-6f15-4f29-8569-e9cccae92d67",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of shipping intermediation levels for Chegg, ThredUp, StubHub, and eBay/Craigslist.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7ed80f15-a053-4a07-8be7-75a809fbb7ad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "GoshPosh Acts As Intermediary for All Transactions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3b50d009-2c1a-486f-a551-4175059c5275",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "0f55587e-add5-48cb-a3b7-0aad882039fa",
      "evidence": "Table comparing service levels across competitors",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "b376adb5-1177-45ed-ad7e-77b8fa29a0b0",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Business Model",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-business-model",
      "evidence": "The deck explains the business model",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "4db4bfa9-b745-4224-bc89-92d99063d74f",
      "evidence": "The deck implies that not investing in GoshPosh means missing out on a massive opportunity",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What if we don't invest in a mobile-based marketplace?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
      "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
      "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "461b10ec-3e28-48c2-a84c-faf721b85ad1",
      "evidence": "The deck presents GoshPosh as a big bet with potential for quick wins",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Can we quickly win with a big bet on GoshPosh?",
      "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}