{
  "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b9-193ac5ec30c3",
  "docSlug": "XtzHBsctoUkUAY3wddgu",
  "documentTitle": "Here's the pitch deck chip design startup Nuvia;; led by an Apple veteran;; used to raise $240 million as it navigates the industry shockwaves of the Nvidia/Arm merger",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "Nuvia",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.784,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 20,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The chart illustrates a convergence trend where ARM performance is closing the gap with X86.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "line_chart",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b9-193ac5ec30c3/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b9-193ac5ec30c3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b9-193ac5ec30c3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b9-193ac5ec30c3#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "5-year CPU Performance Improvement",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8212d11a-bb94-43f8-9b56-b84ccd7764d5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "CPU Performance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-a291-77df-ac47-f956174a21af",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.57,
        "y": 0.96
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "*The CPU performance for ‘Leading ARM SoC’ for year 2019 is projected as a moving average of its past years perf",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1e867ef4-7392-4968-8460-6140f839f586",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.025,
        "y": 0.075
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Paradigm Shift in CPU Performance Leadership",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "71b1e6d8-f216-40df-9cd2-286117c3b74a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f747e258-30ad-4133-be99-1bcb3a4c440e",
      "evidence": "5-year CPU Performance Improvement",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "f5c98276-5ffc-4e43-98ee-a2bc693f5902",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of two competing technology architectures over time.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "af1b17b4-d186-494f-8787-a821b1e0febe",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Market Size",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size",
      "evidence": "Paradigm Shift in CPU Performance Leadership and Geekbench 5 Performance Per Watt",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "e6c4e970-24b3-47c1-a4c4-f304b709f9c7",
      "evidence": "Paradigm Shift in CPU Performance Leadership",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "The cost of inaction in the face of industry change",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}