{
  "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b8-3114bdb9544f",
  "docSlug": "SwTCXaIgQHmiSVWEDUef",
  "documentTitle": "Read the pitch deck that helped email startup Front raise a $65 million funding round led by Salesforce and Battery Ventures as venture capital markets cool off",
  "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
  "authorName": "Front",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.781,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 11,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "market_sizing",
  "function": "size_opportunity",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The matrix uses a non-standard layout where 'Front' is positioned at the intersection of the axes, suggesting it bridges multiple categories.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "bullet_list",
    "matrix_2x2"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b8-3114bdb9544f/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b8-3114bdb9544f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b8-3114bdb9544f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b8-3114bdb9544f#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.41,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "2x2 matrix comparing Inbound/Outbound vs Low/High Stakes",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ea1b6e71-c0f2-4d39-bbe0-3983675e72fb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "2x2 Matrix",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Structuring frame",
      "toolSlug": "structuring-frame",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-a28f-707d-b91e-0d816792283f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.365
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "We start in high-stakes inbound as first-mover\nTAM growing due to automation & commoditization",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "af7689a6-c82e-4f5c-a338-4b0a60119e6c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "A massive market opportunity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b7b73af9-d0c4-445e-bc49-cfc58d76acee",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "ea570813-b587-49e4-a55d-f05d0586a8de",
      "evidence": "framework/instance: 2x2 matrix comparing Inbound/Outbound vs Low/High Stakes",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "matrix-2x2",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "2f43d64f-93c4-41f8-810a-fa9a92a068fb",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a 2x2 grid to categorize market segments.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "a63912dc-a871-419f-8cf4-aaec48aca234",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Market Size",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size",
      "evidence": "Market sizing is discussed on page 5",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 5,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "b8a12354-15ed-4ba3-a9cf-72afcc060ee9",
      "evidence": "The market sizing section implies the cost of inaction",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What if we don't solve this problem?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}