{
  "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6",
  "docSlug": "d1e3e0f8d21b8f30",
  "documentTitle": "2019 Capital Markets Day Presentation",
  "authorId": "SAP",
  "authorName": "SAP",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 23,
  "pageCount": 41,
  "prevPage": 22,
  "nextPage": 24,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a dot-matrix visualization to compare SAP against Salesforce, Microsoft, Adobe, and ServiceNow across 11 functional categories.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6/23",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be4-edc0be72acb6#slide-23",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of software vendors (SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, Adobe, ServiceNow) across 11 categories (Sales, Service, Marketing, Commerce, Customer Data, Collaboration, Cloud Platform, Integration, Industries, Open Data Initiative, X Data & O Data)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "33f9d988-778d-4607-959f-8ee1976c2dbc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Best-of-Suite: Most complete portfolio",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "979b1394-5caf-4319-90ab-f255dc364855",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-e4ca-7578-850e-4ba8969d5857",
      "evidence": "'Best-of-Suite: Most complete portfolio.'",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "NxN matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-nxn",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6a11ca62-f11d-403f-82a5-4d835ab018fb",
      "evidence": "table/data: Comparison matrix of software vendors (SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft, Adobe, ServiceNow) across 11 categories (Sales, Service, Marketing, Commerce, Customer Data, Collaboration, Cloud Platform, Integration, Indu",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Von Restorff Effect",
      "slug": "von-restorff-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de91d-e4eb-7797-9202-e4f932e0a524",
      "evidence": "SAP dots in gold, competitors greyed out.",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "9f051cb8-dfa6-45cd-9ad9-e026a37b039b",
      "evidence": "Matrix comparing product portfolios of multiple competitors.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "Heatmap matrix",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019de91d-e9b4-74cd-beec-c7abbdbf3181",
      "evidence": "Vendor x capability dot-grid with SAP highlighted.",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019de91d-dde0-77fb-879b-448e272de323",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Intelligent Enterprise framework (p10-17) and C/4HANA suite + advantage (p18-26).",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019de91d-de8c-77ea-896a-42412a540b54",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Why Intelligent Enterprise + C/4HANA matter, with customer voice.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 22,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019de91d-df57-741d-9b61-1e240712f36e",
      "evidence": "Magic Quadrants (p22), portfolio matrix (p23), rank table (p24), logo wins (p25), 3-pillar advantage (p26).",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Stack analyst, portfolio, ranking, momentum evidence to declare CX leadership",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}