{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-f46ff198bcc8",
  "docSlug": "36acf8085928f478",
  "documentTitle": "2024 Outcompeting with AI in Process Industries",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 18,
  "pageCount": 29,
  "prevPage": 17,
  "nextPage": 19,
  "slideType": "case_study",
  "function": "present_solution",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram to contrast three computational approaches.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "process_diagram",
    "bullet_list",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-f46ff198bcc8/18",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-f46ff198bcc8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-f46ff198bcc8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-f46ff198bcc8#slide-18",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.9,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.304,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Input to Methods of computation (Traditional methods, Traditional AI, Gen AI)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "941f6dd7-58d9-481f-900f-db4c5fba7a42",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.304,
        "y": 0.39
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Traditional methods: Unable to encode high dimensionality, less precise, poorly-defined clusters",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0aeb1c4e-cbba-4d7c-bed2-5a522b7017ce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.74,
        "y": 0.39
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Gen AI: Selection of relevant chemicals, generation of new molecule formulas, automated iterative testing",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4654adf9-c300-477d-ab21-c830e12329f9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.39
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Traditional AI: Clear classification, cluster similar images, recommendation systems, unable to design optimal compound",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "77bd32f0-671a-4ec5-9a06-4258d500d487",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.23,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "R&D: Gen AI enables chemical components discovery",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "294e30a1-71e0-458f-9c0b-91b608d18673",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "b1c27fac-4d9b-479f-a3c7-5c3022051270",
      "evidence": "Comparison of three distinct computational methods across effectiveness and capabilities.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 23,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "b807bdfe-588b-449e-9456-b2df123d47b9",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The deck provides client examples and impact sizing",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 18,
      "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
      "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
      "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "8ec285f0-4c25-4469-bc5f-ac5f4799cc7b",
      "evidence": "The deck provides case studies for AI use cases",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "What are the quick wins and big bets for AI adoption?",
      "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}