{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-6e331a5623a1",
  "docSlug": "e228a35ad9610ecc",
  "documentTitle": "2016 Benedict Evans 2016 Mobile is Eating the World",
  "authorId": "BenedictEvans",
  "authorName": "Benedict Evans",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "independent_analyst",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Independent analyst",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 70,
  "pageCount": 78,
  "prevPage": 69,
  "nextPage": 71,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 11,
  "notes": "The chart highlights that tech giants like Apple and Google have capex spending comparable to major automotive manufacturers.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-6e331a5623a1/70",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-6e331a5623a1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-6e331a5623a1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-6e331a5623a1#slide-70",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Leading tech companies now spend as much on capex as car OEMs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-4e53-702a-8b7a-9081b33646c3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "2015 capex ($bn)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8061ef23-054e-44f3-9d09-55fe4103cb0a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "2015 capex ($bn): $14.6bn",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-4e53-702a-8b7a-96b7971f2956",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.08,
        "x": 0.88,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Bloomberg",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ce6f3289-9f69-4b2f-8b5f-62896060c665",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.19,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Leading tech companies now spend as much on capex as car OEMs. Apple has $237bn gross cash, while Google has $73bn",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7fa6f865-a8b0-43c8-868c-fb631b6444e8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.19,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "(Unfair but relevant – capex scale)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "da740062-5d4e-45f3-a862-5a0cef2b8890",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1b83-7130-9336-22d51e63cea1",
      "evidence": "Title '(Unfair but relevant - capex scale)' frames the comparison.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "1a7177d1-7137-456a-9d9b-eb9c89758875",
      "evidence": "2015 capex ($bn)",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Concrete Language",
      "slug": "concrete-language",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1b83-7130-9336-25a8aa33197a",
      "evidence": "$14.6bn capex figure.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Principle",
      "slug": "contrast-principle",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1b83-7130-9336-2bf9faa7aeef",
      "evidence": "Tech capex vs auto-OEM capex compared.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 77,
      "from": 49,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd64-9089dcf59100",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Implications",
      "beatSlug": "onion-implications",
      "evidence": "ecommerce (retailers as newspapers) and cars (as phones) sections illustrate the consequences",
      "position": 5,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 77,
      "from": 64,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd64-a742a8daaa2a",
      "arcName": "The Sparkline",
      "arcSlug": "sparkline",
      "beatName": "New Bliss",
      "beatSlug": "sparkline-new-bliss",
      "evidence": "future of cars and cities reshaped",
      "position": 5,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 72,
      "from": 65,
      "name": "Analogy",
      "slug": "08-analogy",
      "bestFor": "Complex concepts, new markets, technical explanations for non-experts",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2d-f81c27bdff28",
      "evidence": "Cars-as-phones (p.65) -> two paths (p.66) -> battery curve -> 'precedent - unbundling phones' (p.69) -> moat questions.",
      "position": 9,
      "objective": "Apply phones-unbundling analogy to predict cars disruption",
      "structure": "The Familiar Domain -> Key Parallel -> Applied to Our Situation -> Insight",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Explain the unfamiliar through a well-understood parallel domain"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}