{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b",
  "docSlug": "485b1e996a637b43",
  "documentTitle": "2025 AI Agents and the Model Context Protocol",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 17,
  "pageCount": 37,
  "prevPage": 16,
  "nextPage": 18,
  "slideType": "maturity_model",
  "function": "diagnose",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a maturity model framework to map current AI agent capabilities against future requirements.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "data_table",
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b/17",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b#slide-17",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Maturity model of 6 AI agent capabilities",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6f643cb3-5fab-474b-badb-ce6dd8d8a63b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Perceived maturity by AI experts; Divergent expert perspective",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "03da9929-6b4f-4456-b935-ccdbc4fb8e9c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Source: BCG analysis; Expert interviews. 1. To tools & data; 2. Ability to use long-context windows, recall accuracy from training data, knowledge consciousness and ability to know when to call external tools, intra-session memory (learning)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "68302001-1f4c-473d-be68-4a1d6c58c9ef",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Constrained agents working today, but full autonomy on the horizon",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "83b9cfcb-c6d1-4872-ad7e-fc8ce63565cc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-c17ebf5d52f1",
      "evidence": "Title 'Constrained agents working today, but full autonomy on the horizon'",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Data-Ink Ratio",
      "slug": "data-ink-ratio",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-cc4b1f7cd56e",
      "evidence": "Clean three-row matrix without chartjunk",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Law of Similarity",
      "slug": "law-of-similarity",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-cb86aca7e43f",
      "evidence": "Consistent grid styling makes the six dimensions read as a unified comparison",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Maturity model",
      "slug": "maturity-model",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "bb51bf1a-3129-4bd2-84cb-2f4add3982a1",
      "evidence": "The slide is a maturity model.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-c7134d5a461e",
      "evidence": "Six parallel columns each with maturity bar + limitations + needed evolution",
      "confidence": 85
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "BCG's Agent Assessment Framework",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bba3-6f1ec110702c",
      "evidence": "Same six dimensions plotted across maturity / limitations / next steps",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "maturity-model",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "4bb6cfa6-ff48-4813-925b-959ea34d1007",
      "evidence": "The slide maps 6 capabilities across a maturity spectrum with current limitations and future requirements.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-efdc0c3bfe92",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "PMF reached only narrowly; 6-dim assessment exposes capability gaps",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 13,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e3a-022aa9a7736c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Section 03 reliability benchmarks and BCG capability framework",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 16,
      "name": "Capability Gap",
      "slug": "48-capability-gap",
      "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-fbe911d5d520",
      "evidence": "p16 defines 6 dimensions; p17 plots Low/Med/High maturity per dimension with limitations and what-needs-to-happen",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Diagnose where agents fall short across 6 capabilities",
      "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}