{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b",
  "docSlug": "485b1e996a637b43",
  "documentTitle": "2025 AI Agents and the Model Context Protocol",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 16,
  "pageCount": 37,
  "prevPage": 15,
  "nextPage": 17,
  "slideType": "other",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide presents a proprietary BCG framework for AI agent evaluation.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "numbered_list",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b/16",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-47815abb602b#slide-16",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "BCG Agent Assessment Framework",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "76e51ba2-6927-4be3-8154-3b7d795b1ebb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "1. Reasoning & Planning; 2. Task autonomy & Execution; 3. Memory & Knowledge; 4. Reliability & Safety; 5. Integration & Interoperability; 6. Social understanding",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b3453bb-5ced-4a34-ae24-c87052c1dcf5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: BCG analysis; Expert interviews",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9604ce95-c8ce-4615-8b0e-4a31186554cd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The 6 dimensions we use to track Agent performance in 2025",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "01347655-77bb-4518-aa18-3b9bca0673b1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "BCG's Agent Assessment Framework",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6c9e0747-65f0-45d6-bd6e-d4dcb99953fa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Issue Tree",
      "slug": "issue-tree",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-bfc9a63213e3",
      "evidence": "MECE decomposition of 'agent capability' into 6 sub-categories",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Chunking",
      "slug": "chunking",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-b9168006286c",
      "evidence": "Six discrete capability buckets with parallel structure",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-b119976b7d48",
      "evidence": "Title names the framework: 'BCG's Agent Assessment Framework'",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1155-76cc-9e44-b78ff99fdaee",
      "evidence": "Numbered black tiles 1-6 above bold dimension names above descriptions",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "BCG Agent Assessment Framework",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "aa84aef4-2153-4990-a60f-32bb0fb4e5df",
      "evidence": "Explicitly titled as BCG's Agent Assessment Framework with 6 dimensions.",
      "confidence": 1
    },
    {
      "name": "BCG's Agent Assessment Framework",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bba3-6b3837feb0da",
      "evidence": "Title names the framework; subtitle '6 dimensions we use to track Agent performance'",
      "confidence": 95
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-efdc0c3bfe92",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "PMF reached only narrowly; 6-dim assessment exposes capability gaps",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 13,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e3a-022aa9a7736c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Section 03 reliability benchmarks and BCG capability framework",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 16,
      "name": "Capability Gap",
      "slug": "48-capability-gap",
      "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-fbe911d5d520",
      "evidence": "p16 defines 6 dimensions; p17 plots Low/Med/High maturity per dimension with limitations and what-needs-to-happen",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Diagnose where agents fall short across 6 capabilities",
      "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}