{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 43,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 42,
  "nextPage": 44,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 25,
  "notes": "The slide uses a step chart to show historical progress and a bar chart to show current rankings.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "line_chart",
    "bar_chart_vertical"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/43",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-43",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Today, the most intelligent models remain closed: GPT-5, o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 4.1 Opus, and new entrant, Grok 4.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a81f-338ed088049c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.38,
        "w": 0.46,
        "x": 0.51,
        "y": 0.51
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights vs Proprietary",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc4a736f-dbe1-4cca-b876-8f0aa3f2a918",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.38,
        "w": 0.46,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.51
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Progress in Open Weights vs. Proprietary Intelligence",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f6468f99-f7db-4136-af79-c6d5fa238b6b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 67",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a81f-3534432030ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "There was a brief moment around this time last year where the intelligence gap between open vs. closed models seemed to have compressed. And then o1-preview dropped and the intelligence gap widened significantly until DeepSeek R1, and o3 after it. Today, the most intelligent models remain closed: GPT-5, o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 4.1 Opus, and new entrant, Grok 4. Beside gpt-oss, the strongest open weights model is Qwen. Pictured are the aggregate Intelligence Index, which combines multiple capabilities dimensions across 10 evaluations.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4b394f40-cb58-49de-8890-07b39fa022c0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Open source vs. proprietary: where are we now?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "326f2aad-e2e0-4656-bc36-4d84154a8ef5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95c-04b6df3fca4f",
      "evidence": "Slide explicitly frames open-source vs. proprietary state.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95c-0ab4bca95035",
      "evidence": "Title poses the contrast: 'Open source vs. proprietary: where are we now?'",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 189,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-9f380673831f",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 1-2 lay out research findings and industry data with charts and case studies.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 89,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-ac68557d958b",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "First Layer",
      "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer",
      "evidence": "Research section unpacks technical layer beneath the headlines.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 47,
      "from": 42,
      "name": "David Goliath",
      "slug": "16-david-goliath",
      "bestFor": "Startups, disruptive innovation, competitive displacement",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-98bdad14c2b0",
      "evidence": "'New Silk Road: China's open models overtake Meta-led West' (p.45); Qwen >40% derivatives vs Llama's 15% (p.46).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Show China's open-weight ecosystem overtaking Meta-led West",
      "structure": "The Giant's Weakness -> Our Slingshot (Unique Edge) -> The Topple",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Frame your initiative as the nimble underdog taking on a slow, bloated incumbent"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}