{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 281,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 280,
  "nextPage": 282,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "The chart shows a clear upward trend in Chinese AI safety research papers.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "line_chart"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/281",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-281",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Researchers warn that US assumptions about China ignoring AI safety are wrong: Beijing is implementing strong safeguards, integrating AI safety into China's National Emergency Response Plan (alongside pandemics and cyberattacks) and removing 3,500 non-compliant AI products from the market.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d09-d34e92b6646e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.64,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 3.1: Chinese frontier AI safety papers per month",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7461fa03-376b-48ea-8fce-6ab4b9b50d89",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.58,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Chinese regulators mandate pre-deployment safety reviews and are removing non-compliant products.\nChina released more national AI standards in early 2025 than in the previous three years.\nDing Xuexiang emphasized safety controls at WEF 2025.\nChina launched bilateral AI safety dialogues with the U.S. and UK.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e919f949-535e-4324-b161-d753bd0995c6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Number of papers: 3,500",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d09-da437cdb3cb7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Researchers warn that US assumptions about China ignoring AI safety are wrong: Beijing is implementing strong safeguards, integrating AI safety into China's National Emergency Response Plan and removing 3,500 non-compliant AI products.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7f6b222f-7e3a-44bc-bbb1-b376c739cd16",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "it's impossible to safely step on the accelerator without first properly controlling the brakes",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d09-d5b9fad08cf4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "China turns up the heat on AI Safety",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "695e25a5-bf09-46a5-a2d0-5c271b9c7bcd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-a256fe16ea9c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 3-4 frame political and safety consequences of the technical/industry trends.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-b713af60bf88",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Core Insight",
      "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
      "evidence": "Politics and Safety reveal the structural risks at the core.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 247,
      "name": "Pre Mortem",
      "slug": "19-pre-mortem",
      "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-bb4d43115ab4",
      "evidence": "Vibe hacking, AI psychosis, alignment faking, scheming, prompt injection — what could go wrong + mitigations.",
      "position": 12,
      "objective": "Surface AI safety failure modes before they become catastrophic",
      "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}