{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 278,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 277,
  "nextPage": 279,
  "slideType": "key_messages",
  "function": "recommend",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a conceptual chart to illustrate the 'adaptation buffer' between capability demonstration and wide accessibility.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bullet_list",
    "line_chart"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/278",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-278",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The priority is to use that “adaptation buffer” to harden society rather than to chase permanent bans.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d0a-2242d2f394fc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.68,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Conceptual chart showing the adaptation buffer window between capability demonstration and wide accessibility.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "area",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "68a387a3-50d4-4b49-9569-cc43c7ab4356",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.4
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "First demos trigger fast replication cost drops once methods and know-how circulate.\nUse the adaptation buffer to build resilience, not chase permanent caps.\nBiosecurity now: expand red-teaming/uplift; pre-position screening and detection; fund rapid countermeasures.\nCybersecurity now: deploy model-assisted code review/IDS, segment networks, and run incident drills.\nShort-term levers: keep top models private briefly; improve capability forecasting and triggers.\nNet message: resilience beats bans once capabilities are publicly demonstrated.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cbfbc993-9231-4f0e-b56e-4b38c69397c6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Toner’s argument is that proliferation is inevitable, so policy should maximize defensive preparation during the short window between frontier demonstration and wide access. Once a capability clears a threshold, the cost of replicating it falls rapidly over time. The priority is to use that “adaptation buffer” to harden society rather than to chase permanent bans.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "df8f7c7c-6a4c-46d3-b723-f637e89999a5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Paths forward: 2) Adaptation buffers, building resilience over restriction",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d7d4b798-7b5b-4163-8ec1-a551a1a1af58",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "9e2dec7f-2bd6-4351-a8b0-070bd969bec0",
      "evidence": "chart/area: Conceptual chart showing the adaptation buffer window between capability demonstration and wide accessibility",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "resilience-vs-restriction",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "0898d5ab-4dce-4937-ad7e-190c44ccd26f",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly contrasts building resilience with chasing permanent bans as a policy strategy.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-a256fe16ea9c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 3-4 frame political and safety consequences of the technical/industry trends.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-b713af60bf88",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Core Insight",
      "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
      "evidence": "Politics and Safety reveal the structural risks at the core.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 247,
      "name": "Pre Mortem",
      "slug": "19-pre-mortem",
      "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-bb4d43115ab4",
      "evidence": "Vibe hacking, AI psychosis, alignment faking, scheming, prompt injection — what could go wrong + mitigations.",
      "position": 12,
      "objective": "Surface AI safety failure modes before they become catastrophic",
      "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}