{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 277,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 276,
  "nextPage": 278,
  "slideType": "strategic_options",
  "function": "present_solution",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide outlines a geopolitical strategy for AI safety involving surveillance and international cooperation.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/277",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-277",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "They introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM): a deterrence regime resembling nuclear mutual assured destruction where any state's aggressive bid for unilateral AI dominance is met with preventive sabotage by rivals.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d09-b9b632340ea4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Three pillars: Deterrence, Nonproliferation, Competitiveness",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "infographic",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "99b56bc2-babb-40d8-a227-a68fb5e9ebb0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.48,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "They introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM): a deterrence regime resembling nuclear mutual assured destruction where any state's aggressive bid for unilateral AI dominance is met with preventive sabotage by rivals.\nArgues we must adopt three pillars (see: figure).\nThis would require expanding surveillance as compute gets cheaper, eventually monitoring large numbers of actors with GPU clusters.\nBut major powers must agree to restrict their own AI development and enforce limits on others despite massive economic incentives to defect and no existing international institutions capable of verification or enforcement. Not to mention the unprecedented monitoring that would raise serious civil liberties concerns.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "24eafe8f-905c-48ca-9630-444082bed049",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Dan Hendrycks, Eric Schmidt and Alexandr Wang argue we should pursue nonproliferation: track AI compute, lock down model weights, and build technical safeguards to keep dangerous AI capabilities from bad actors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a933e8b9-66f5-4bc7-a12d-b1e3b7d64196",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Paths forward: 1) Deterrence and non-proliferation, just lock it down",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "24729e90-7948-4eb6-821f-a31feaf4aef2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "97958e60-e2bc-4786-a879-6dfd0402fab9",
      "evidence": "image/infographic: Three pillars: Deterrence, Nonproliferation, Competitiveness",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Metaphor & Analogy",
      "slug": "metaphor-analogy",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95c-d43ef054ae4a",
      "evidence": "MAIM borrows nuclear MAD doctrine as analogy for AI deterrence.",
      "confidence": 85
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM)",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bba0-f0cec6458872",
      "evidence": "Slide explicitly names MAIM doctrine analogous to nuclear MAD.",
      "confidence": 90
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-a256fe16ea9c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 3-4 frame political and safety consequences of the technical/industry trends.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-b713af60bf88",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Core Insight",
      "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
      "evidence": "Politics and Safety reveal the structural risks at the core.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 247,
      "name": "Pre Mortem",
      "slug": "19-pre-mortem",
      "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-bb4d43115ab4",
      "evidence": "Vibe hacking, AI psychosis, alignment faking, scheming, prompt injection — what could go wrong + mitigations.",
      "position": 12,
      "objective": "Surface AI safety failure modes before they become catastrophic",
      "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}