{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 260,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 259,
  "nextPage": 261,
  "slideType": "key_messages",
  "function": "frame_problem",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Features headshots of key figures in the welfare-skeptic camp.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "bullet_list",
    "headshot"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/260",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-260",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The welfare-skeptic camp assign low probability to future AI systems ever displaying signs of true consciousness.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d08-b2eea0a03e4a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Welfare-Skeptic Camp headshots",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headshot",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b90f9be5-7ad6-40cd-9c77-511044b41da4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "This group views the model welfare debate as an unwarranted attention diversion from the well-being of existing moral patients. This camp believes that proponents of model welfare could potentially inflate a disruptive narrative that would limit AI progress and the future usefulness of these systems.\nFirst coined by Microsoft’s AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman, \"Seemingly Conscious AI\" (SCAI) can convincingly imitate all the characteristics of consciousness without actually being conscious.\nThey contend that labs should steer training away from the development of SCAIs, since these systems can exacerbate cases of \"AI psychosis\" and cause a misplaced advocacy for AI rights.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "383cfd79-da96-494c-800f-d2338d537b09",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Some early works and podcasts on the topic have been linked below",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f7366692-35c7-41ee-8538-955d5255f381",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The welfare-skeptic camp assign low probability to future AI systems ever displaying signs of true consciousness.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0a8a00aa-77e0-4c64-9576-37983ca61b10",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The Model Welfare debate: what does the opposition think?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7d95256c-93b4-49de-a557-c10d4900f35c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Thesis archetype",
      "slug": "thesis-archetype",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "0541869e-1912-46bc-ba90-ef58e1122dd4",
      "evidence": "The welfare-skeptic camp assign low probability to future AI systems ever displaying signs of true consciousness.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-a256fe16ea9c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 3-4 frame political and safety consequences of the technical/industry trends.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-b713af60bf88",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Core Insight",
      "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
      "evidence": "Politics and Safety reveal the structural risks at the core.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 247,
      "name": "Pre Mortem",
      "slug": "19-pre-mortem",
      "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-bb4d43115ab4",
      "evidence": "Vibe hacking, AI psychosis, alignment faking, scheming, prompt injection — what could go wrong + mitigations.",
      "position": 12,
      "objective": "Surface AI safety failure modes before they become catastrophic",
      "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}