{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 259,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 258,
  "nextPage": 260,
  "slideType": "problem_statement",
  "function": "frame_problem",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide highlights the emergence of a 'pro-welfare' camp in AI research, citing organizations like Eleos AI, Anthropic, and NYU.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bullet_list",
    "logo_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/259",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-259",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Should moral considerations be extended to frontier AI systems? Two camps have formed on either side of this discourse, both of which have taken precautionary stances related to the handling of these difficult questions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d07-d1caff73814d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.73,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Pro-Welfare Camp: Eleos AI, Anthropic, NYU Mind, Ethics & Policy",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo-grid",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a3a0d694-1079-4f11-af95-8d0b3b1074a2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.31
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The pro-welfare camp generally place a low weight on the possibility that current systems display consciousness. Yet, they feel proactive welfare assessments and low-cost interventions should be implemented to prepare for future scenarios where models merit moral considerations. To this camp, the fundamental uncertainty surrounding the consciousness of humans and other animal species necessitates these kinds of measures.\nFurthermore, proponents of model welfare have also begun exploring potential modifications that could be made to the training process that might improve model experiences later in deployment.\nAlthough Anthropic spearheads this movement amongst the AI labs, GDM and OAI have also recently begun independently researching this topic.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "14e0327b-843f-490c-805d-899e3787db6d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.68,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Should moral considerations be extended to frontier AI systems? Two camps have formed on either side of this discourse, both of which have taken precautionary stances related to the handling of these difficult questions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dc9084f7-b6f5-48f5-9890-c5dc6f4f5d22",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The Model Welfare debate: what’s it about?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5f832ca4-e092-4b31-8868-b09ecc1ca1cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Scenario planning",
      "slug": "scenario-planning",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "700a9f28-40e2-4af4-97a6-b8f76a3c27ce",
      "evidence": "keyword-coverage: scenario, uncertainty",
      "confidence": 0.2
    },
    {
      "name": "Audience Definition",
      "slug": "audience-definition",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "5e319e66-580c-4e41-a6b1-4e5d4b2bc939",
      "evidence": "Should moral considerations be extended to frontier AI systems?",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-a256fe16ea9c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 3-4 frame political and safety consequences of the technical/industry trends.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 190,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-b713af60bf88",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Core Insight",
      "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight",
      "evidence": "Politics and Safety reveal the structural risks at the core.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 282,
      "from": 247,
      "name": "Pre Mortem",
      "slug": "19-pre-mortem",
      "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-bb4d43115ab4",
      "evidence": "Vibe hacking, AI psychosis, alignment faking, scheming, prompt injection — what could go wrong + mitigations.",
      "position": 12,
      "objective": "Surface AI safety failure modes before they become catastrophic",
      "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}