{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 162,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 161,
  "nextPage": 163,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide uses a narrative approach to compare the performance of various competitors against NVIDIA.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/162",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-162",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Many of NVIDIA's competitors, both at home and abroad, have yet to gain meaningful momentum.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c2-727e-a400-f39377209e01",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.75,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Visual representation of competitors",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "illustration",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f44d21f9-07fd-4f77-afe5-47cd941274f0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Many of NVIDIA's competitors, both at home and abroad, have yet to gain meaningful momentum. Earlier this year, Groq reported to investors their expectations that revenue would exceed $2B in 2025. In recent months, that forecast has been revised down dramatically to just $500M. AMD posted underwhelming earnings in their data center unit during Q2. Data center revenue was largely buoyed by EPYC CPU processors, concerning since that segments 14% growth rate still pales in comparison to NVIDIA's recent surge. Huawei faces mounting challenges that threaten to constrain its growth such as HBM bottlenecks. On the demand side, many of China's cloud giants view Huawei as a fierce competitor, which leads to resistance in the adoption of their stack. G42, Cerebras' primary investor, has agreed to purchase $1.43B of equipment through the end of 2025 from the hardware provider. Yet, it is not clear whether Cerebras has seen traction from other customers.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9e816aed-3b8a-4867-838c-2001fce5f434",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "revenue: $500M",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c2-727e-a400-f56247342c91",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "“Challengers” are no closer to catching NVIDIA",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4502875f-14f7-4084-a097-20a649df6c20",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 189,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-9f380673831f",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 1-2 lay out research findings and industry data with charts and case studies.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 189,
      "from": 90,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-b06421e14afb",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer",
      "evidence": "Industry section exposes economics, infra, geopolitics beneath research.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 170,
      "from": 162,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-b059b69d94da",
      "evidence": "'Challengers no closer to catching NVIDIA' (p.162); $7.5B in challengers vs $85B in NVIDIA stock (p.167).",
      "position": 10,
      "objective": "Contrast NVIDIA's dominance vs challenger silicon (US and Chinese)",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}