{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "docSlug": "5df6bd1b0447b5f6",
  "documentTitle": "2025 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2025",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 107,
  "pageCount": 313,
  "prevPage": 106,
  "nextPage": 108,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 2,
  "notes": "Includes a social media testimonial as supporting evidence for the trend.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "screenshot",
    "quote_block"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1/107",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0d0f98caffe1#slide-107",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Deep Think would have placed first and second respectively in the most prestigious coding competition in the world.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a825-769a742b1a17",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.58,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Taelin tweet: BTW, I've basically stopped using Opus entirely and I now have several Codex tabs with GPT-5-high working on different tasks across the 3 codebases (HVM, Bend, Kolmo). Progress has never been so intense. My job now is basically passing well-specified tasks to Codex, and reviewing its outputs. OpenAI isn't paying me and couldn't care less about me. This model is just very good and the fact people can't see it made me realize most of you are probably using chatbots as girlfriends or something other than assisting with complex coding tasks",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "screenshot",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ea7771ef-a4c1-4474-8d92-9255e1b1f348",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "For the International Collegiate Programming Contest (ICPC) World Finals, an OpenAI Researcher explained how they had GPT-5 and an experimental reasoning model generating solutions, and the experimental reasoning model selecting which solutions to submit. GPT-5 answered 11 correctly, and the last (and most difficult problem) was solved by the experimental reasoning model.\nThe OpenAI Codex team have been cooking: Sam Altman claimed GPT-5-Codex usage had increased 10x, and their internal code review bot became so valuable that developers were \"upset when it broke\" because they lost their \"safety net\".",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "21de5799-7a74-4977-b8a0-eb5aa634390a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Deep Think would have placed first and second respectively in the most prestigious coding competition in the world (without having trained with this competition in mind). GPT-5 solved all 12 problems, with 11 on the first try. Previously, Anthropic had enjoyed a period of relatively uncontested dominance in programming tasks.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "adf6c5a8-b132-4ab3-bc2d-010a4fb6ca78",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "BTW, I've basically stopped using Opus entirely and I now have several Codex tabs with GPT-5-high working on different tasks across the 3 codebases (HVM, Bend, Kolmo). Progress has never been so intense. — Taelin (@VictorTaelin)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a825-7803eb67e772",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Models are getting seriously good at coding, with OpenAI pulling ahead",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "755252de-a019-484d-b0de-7bc0369bc55c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 189,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-9f380673831f",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Sections 1-2 lay out research findings and industry data with charts and case studies.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 189,
      "from": 90,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-b06421e14afb",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer",
      "evidence": "Industry section exposes economics, infra, geopolitics beneath research.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 112,
      "from": 105,
      "name": "Funnel Analysis",
      "slug": "32-funnel-analysis",
      "bestFor": "Sales optimization, customer journey, process efficiency",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-a3f81a44ee54",
      "evidence": "GPT-5 economics → vibe coding costs → Cursor unit economics → 'When do we see profitable models?' (p.112).",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Trace AI economics from revenue through margins to profitability",
      "structure": "Top of Funnel -> Stage 1 Conversion -> Stage 2 Conversion -> Bottom of Funnel -> The Leak",
      "confidence": 65,
      "description": "Show progressive filtering through stages to identify where drop-off occurs"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}