{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "docSlug": "8757f1b44ef7f176",
  "documentTitle": "2024 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2024",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 84,
  "pageCount": 213,
  "prevPage": 83,
  "nextPage": 85,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "present_solution",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 3,
  "notes": "The slide contrasts manual/brittle RPA processes with automated, foundation-model-based workflows.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "process_diagram",
    "screenshot"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9/84",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9#slide-84",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In experiments on the NCEN-QA dataset, FlowMind achieved 99.5% accuracy in workflow understanding.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d16-4adb8d1df037",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Comparison diagram of RPA vs ECLAIR across Demonstrate, Execute, and Validate stages.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cc723474-af14-4d86-99bf-76ba5f9e2f65",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.58,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "FlowMind and ECLAIR workflow examples.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "screenshot",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "77d2d478-21c0-459e-9643-3af033ffc182",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Workflow accuracy: 99.5%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d16-4dcc9042ddbc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Traditional Robotic Process Automation (RPA), embodied by UiPath, has struggled with high set-up costs, brittle execution, and burdensome maintenance. Two novel approaches, FlowMind (JP Morgan) and ECLAIR (Stanford), use foundation models to address these limitations. FlowMind focuses on financial workflows, using LLMs to generate executable workflows via APIs. In experiments on the NCEN-QA dataset, FlowMind achieved 99.5% accuracy in workflow understanding. ECLAIR takes a broader approach, using multimodal models to learn from demonstrations and interact directly with graphical user interfaces across various enterprise settings. On web navigation tasks, ECLAIR improved completion rates from 0% to 40%.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8a46426b-9c46-463e-9281-ab3aca48b3e2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Enterprise automation set to get an AI-first upgrade",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ea504f41-6bcd-4a0e-9915-b9bf2364ef66",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a959-42703039c9d8",
      "evidence": "Title 'Enterprise automation set to get an AI-first upgrade'",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "9e18ff0a-4a74-45fd-b917-402918c8a31a",
      "evidence": "Comparison diagram of RPA vs ECLAIR across Demonstrate, Execute, and Validate stages",
      "confidence": 0.6
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 153,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-5f2398b8d1d0",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Exec summary + Research + Industry sections inventory the year",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 85,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-6d9d8ee06d0a",
      "arcName": "Voyage and Return",
      "arcSlug": "voyage-return",
      "beatName": "The Unknown",
      "beatSlug": "voyage-return-the-unknown",
      "evidence": "Research section explores frontier model uncharted territory",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 85,
      "from": 82,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-4669f7c62bd4",
      "evidence": "Med-Gemini, synthetic CXR, FlowMind, balance-of-power slide closes section",
      "position": 10,
      "objective": "Round out research review with medicine + enterprise apps",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 65,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}