{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "docSlug": "8757f1b44ef7f176",
  "documentTitle": "2024 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2024",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 181,
  "pageCount": 213,
  "prevPage": 180,
  "nextPage": 182,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Part of the 'state of ai 2024' report.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.9,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9/181",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9#slide-181",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Regardless of the fate of the EO, at a Congressional level, safety remains a bipartisan issue, with both parties signing up to an AI policy roadmap in May.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d1f-f68fb6e3441a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.72,
        "y": 0.495
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Trump V.P. pick J.D. Vance praised for comments seemingly in support of open source AI",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a063f047-e91c-42cd-9de9-5d823273d08e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The 2024 Republican platform commits to repealing the AI executive order (EO), claiming it “hinders AI Innovation, and imposes Radical Leftwing ideas on the development of this technology”, attracting the support of some big names in the Valley. It, however, makes no mention of the future of the US AISI.\nJD Vance is the first member of a presidential ticket to have apparently developed views on these issues, having previously accused big tech companies of using AI safety as a vehicle for regulatory capture.\nMeanwhile, Kamala Harris has said less on the subject. However, her remarks when she visited the UK for the Bletchley Summit were widely interpreted as an implicit critique of the focus on safety questions at the expense of ethics, echoing many UK civil society groups.\nRegardless of the fate of the EO, at a Congressional level, safety remains a bipartisan issue, with both parties signing up to an AI policy roadmap in May.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "afedb26a-864d-432b-938a-dea72998ed84",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "In last year's report, we covered how the culture wars appeared to be slowly coming for AI, with the Gemini 'woke AI' blow up fuelling the fires. Could the US presidential election signal a change in direction?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8be51949-1a7e-480b-961b-553a50a1b71a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Safety goes partisan (sort of)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6d549e6a-f80e-4f01-b285-fc7574fd3581",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95a-8ebe9da4270b",
      "evidence": "Title 'Safety goes partisan (sort of)'",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 204,
      "from": 154,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-605159a069e6",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics + Safety sections explore consequences and risks",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 204,
      "from": 175,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-74f05e198faf",
      "arcName": "Voyage and Return",
      "arcSlug": "voyage-return",
      "beatName": "The Return",
      "beatSlug": "voyage-return-the-return",
      "evidence": "Safety section returns to risks/governance debate",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 181,
      "from": 176,
      "name": "Pivot",
      "slug": "17-pivot",
      "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-71ecd0582cf0",
      "evidence": "Vibe shift slide, OpenAI leadership struggle, AISI launches, safety partisan dynamics",
      "position": 21,
      "objective": "Frame the safety-to-acceleration vibe shift as a strategic pivot",
      "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}