{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "docSlug": "8757f1b44ef7f176",
  "documentTitle": "2024 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2024",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 177,
  "pageCount": 213,
  "prevPage": 176,
  "nextPage": 178,
  "slideType": "key_messages",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Includes a screenshot of a tweet by Matthew Yglesias discussing Sam Altman's views on existential risk.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "screenshot"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9/177",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9#slide-177",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Last year, labs were often enthusiastic participants in discussions about critical risks. When it was escalated to a corporate and commercial tussle at OpenAI, one side clearly emerged on top.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d1f-d8e8acc7c1df",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.67,
        "y": 0.43
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Tweet by Matthew Yglesias",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "screenshot",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1f5606d3-094e-4ab9-b436-8855ed71ceca",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Last year, labs were often enthusiastic participants in discussions about critical risks. When it was escalated to a corporate and commercial tussle at OpenAI, one side clearly emerged on top.\nOn 17 November 2023, Sam Altman was ousted as OpenAI CEO by directors of the non-profit organization. While the full circumstances remain unknown, Altman’s critics have referenced an alleged culture of secrecy and differences of opinion on safety questions.\nFollowing an employee rebellion and intervention by Microsoft, OpenAI’s primary backer, Altman was restored and the board replaced.\nSuperalignment researcher Jan Leike departed for Anthropic, while co-founder Ilya Sutskever left to launch Safe Superintelligence Inc. with ex-Apple AI lead Daniel Gross and ex-OpenAI engineer Daniel Levy.\nShortly following the release of OpenAI o1, amid reports that OpenAI was planning to remove non-profit control and award Altman equity, a number of departures were announced - most notably CTO Mira Murati, Chief Research Officer Bob McGrew and VP Research (post-training) Barret Zoph.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3fdd787c-93b6-4e09-90e0-c2e0b3a0644e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "Notable that @sama is no longer even paying lip service to existential risk concerns, the only downsides he's contemplating are labor market adjustment issues. — Matthew Yglesias",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d1f-debfda315c8c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "OpenAI leadership struggle marks the start of an existential risk backlash",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a130c918-3aeb-4406-af89-c6051ecd9178",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95a-856ebfd1f8dd",
      "evidence": "Title 'OpenAI leadership struggle marks the start of an existential risk backlash'",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Problem Statement Canvas",
      "slug": "problem-statement-canvas",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "2f6d7a8d-ae32-44cb-914e-7afb9df51683",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a critical issue with OpenAI's leadership struggle and its implications on existential risk, which can be seen as a problem statement.",
      "confidence": 0.6
    },
    {
      "name": "Storytelling: audience calibration",
      "slug": "audience",
      "agent": "storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "1bac7d2d-5ebf-44a7-84e4-4269d4991878",
      "evidence": "The slide mentions 'critical risks' and 'existential risk backlash', indicating consideration of the audience's concerns.",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 204,
      "from": 154,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-605159a069e6",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics + Safety sections explore consequences and risks",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 204,
      "from": 175,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-74f05e198faf",
      "arcName": "Voyage and Return",
      "arcSlug": "voyage-return",
      "beatName": "The Return",
      "beatSlug": "voyage-return-the-return",
      "evidence": "Safety section returns to risks/governance debate",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 181,
      "from": 176,
      "name": "Pivot",
      "slug": "17-pivot",
      "bestFor": "Project updates, board meetings, agile retrospectives",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-71ecd0582cf0",
      "evidence": "Vibe shift slide, OpenAI leadership struggle, AISI launches, safety partisan dynamics",
      "position": 21,
      "objective": "Frame the safety-to-acceleration vibe shift as a strategic pivot",
      "structure": "The Original Hypothesis -> The New Discovery -> The Strategic Shift",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Validate a change in direction by showing it is a reaction to new intelligence, not failure"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}