{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "docSlug": "8757f1b44ef7f176",
  "documentTitle": "2024 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2024",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 123,
  "pageCount": 213,
  "prevPage": 122,
  "nextPage": 124,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Part of the 'State of AI 2024' report, specifically the 'Industry' section.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9/123",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9#slide-123",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The central question about whether creators’ copyright has been infringed by model builders via the use of their work for training remains unsolved, but more expansive arguments have been shot down in the courts.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c3-7407-8d19-053a54acadaf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The central question about whether creators' copyright has been infringed by model builders via the use of their work for training remains unsolved, but more expansive arguments have been shot down in the courts.\nCases continue against Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, Midjourney, Runway, Udio, Suno, Stability and others from news outlets, image suppliers, authors, creative artists, and record labels.\nSo far, model builders have failed to get any of these cases dismissed in full, but have managed to narrow their scope significantly.\nFor example, claims from two groups of authors against OpenAI and Meta arguing that the companies were guilty of vicarious copyright infringement because all of their models' outputs are “infringing derivative work” failed, because they were unable to demonstrate “substantial similarity”. Only their original claims on the ground of copyright infringement have been allowed to proceed.\nA similar pruning happened with the cases against Midjourney, Runway, and Stability with plaintiffs told to focus on the original scraping, with many of their wider claims dismissed.\nAmid this uncertainty, Adobe, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI have taken the unusual step of indemnifying their customers against any legal claims they might face on copyright grounds.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "415efe8c-6c7d-4299-8e7c-f3ad28f3a144",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "...while cases jam up the court system and provide little clarity over fair use",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ccd104a3-0883-44ae-9268-23128d5b539e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "88161ebc-4625-447a-ab30-f164e4004ba2",
      "evidence": "The slide contains a list/bullet points with information about key takeaways on fair use.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 153,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-5f2398b8d1d0",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Exec summary + Research + Industry sections inventory the year",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 174,
      "from": 86,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-73133c63a096",
      "arcName": "Voyage and Return",
      "arcSlug": "voyage-return",
      "beatName": "Discoveries",
      "beatSlug": "voyage-return-discoveries",
      "evidence": "Industry + Politics findings on NVIDIA, regulation, geopolitics",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 130,
      "from": 122,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-555aebcfb636",
      "evidence": "Copyright suits, Wayve/Waymo, humanoids, Hollywood/Lionsgate, lab fragmentation",
      "position": 14,
      "objective": "Survey industry maneuvering: copyright, AVs, humanoids, talent",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 65,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}