{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
  "docSlug": "dd91c78f6570bf29",
  "documentTitle": "2023 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2023",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 144,
  "pageCount": 163,
  "prevPage": 143,
  "nextPage": 145,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 25,
  "notes": "The chart shows a positive correlation between safety and ethics research output, with some institutions heavily skewed towards one or the other.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "scatter_plot"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea/144",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea#slide-144",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "While publications on ethics continue to significantly outnumber their existential or extreme risk counterparts, safety has taken centre-stage, fuelled by steps forward in SOTA model capabilities.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c4-7719-a22e-15fc7719d9c1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.58,
        "w": 0.58,
        "x": 0.22,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Scatter plot of AI Safety vs AI Ethics publications",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "scatter",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3c684550-86a4-40eb-b8a6-e3fca8ed81bb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Number of Publications",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c4-7719-a22e-1822513e80cd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "While publications on ethics continue to significantly outnumber their existential or extreme risk counterparts, safety has taken centre-stage, fuelled by steps forward in SOTA model capabilities.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e588522f-281b-470d-a63c-0ab2c894447d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Has x-risk stolen the spotlight from ethics?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bda77e29-375e-4446-a699-8c1159723951",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chartjunk Elimination",
      "slug": "chartjunk-elimination",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "d474c37d-603e-424a-9b80-8707551ef26b",
      "evidence": "Scatter plot of AI Safety vs AI Ethics publications",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 155,
      "from": 121,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-478c8c58938c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics + Safety sections explore regulatory, geopolitical and risk implications.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 155,
      "from": 121,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-554ec1797b3a",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Climax",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
      "evidence": "Regulatory divergence and the x-risk debate erupt into the mainstream.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 148,
      "from": 139,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-17c0a044d464",
      "evidence": "Hendrycks taxonomy, x-risk explosion, sceptics, govt attention, jailbreak evidence accumulate.",
      "position": 14,
      "objective": "Frame the safety debate, both x-risk and demonstrated unsafe behaviour",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}