{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
  "docSlug": "dd91c78f6570bf29",
  "documentTitle": "2023 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2023",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 142,
  "pageCount": 163,
  "prevPage": 141,
  "nextPage": 143,
  "slideType": "key_messages",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Slide from the State of AI 2023 report.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea/142",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea#slide-142",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "These arguments have inspired their own fair share of critics, who question the logic behind x-risk arguments and, in some cases, the motivations of their proponents.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c4-7719-a22e-a1e5c9cd9993",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.76
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) founded by Timnit Gebru published a statement from the listed authors of the Stochastic Parrots paper, arguing that the x-risk was a distraction from the immediate harms arising from corporations deploying automated systems, including worker exploitation, copyright violation, the spread of synthetic information, and the growing concentration of power.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0012cd2b-448f-42dd-a20e-def5c81fe53e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.22,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.32
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Critics have argued that x-risk arguments remain conjecture. For example, François Chollet, a Google AI researcher and one of the main architects of TensorFlow and Keras has argued that: \"There does not exist any AI model or technique that could represent an extinction risk for humanity...not even if you extrapolate capabilities far into the future via scaling laws\". Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen asked, \"What is the testable hypothesis? What would falsify the hypothesis?\"",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bfd58a59-4427-4b4a-8176-1d96121a64fc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.56
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Yann LeCun has argued that we are overestimating the maturity of current AI systems, saying that \"until we have a basic design for even dog-level AI (let alone human level), discussing how to make it safe is premature\". Joelle Pineau, another senior Meta AI leader, branded the x-risk discourse \"unhinged\" and warned that \"when you put an infinite cost, you can't have any rational discussion about any other outcomes\"",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cc8a8e1a-24b9-490c-94c5-f87e2f44c583",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "These arguments have inspired their own fair share of critics, who question the logic behind x-risk arguments and, in some cases, the motivations of their proponents.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "217635e3-d3c5-4fd3-b2a7-fba91673fe86",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "There does not exist any AI model or technique that could represent an extinction risk for humanity...not even if you extrapolate capabilities far into the future via scaling laws. — François Chollet",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c4-7719-a22e-a78d16862552",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "...and the sceptics hitting back",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1ab8aa9b-e66c-4d17-bc6e-941c920fc1a6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Confirmation Bias",
      "slug": "confirmation-bias",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "block",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a957-fc1e641ee234",
      "evidence": "Slide acknowledges sceptics' counter-arguments to balance the prior x-risk slides.",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Antithesis",
      "slug": "antithesis",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "efccff30-c642-4b53-8594-f2a68d9ff157",
      "evidence": "Critics have argued that x-risk arguments remain conjecture.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 155,
      "from": 121,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-478c8c58938c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics + Safety sections explore regulatory, geopolitical and risk implications.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 155,
      "from": 121,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-554ec1797b3a",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Climax",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
      "evidence": "Regulatory divergence and the x-risk debate erupt into the mainstream.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 148,
      "from": 139,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-17c0a044d464",
      "evidence": "Hendrycks taxonomy, x-risk explosion, sceptics, govt attention, jailbreak evidence accumulate.",
      "position": 14,
      "objective": "Frame the safety debate, both x-risk and demonstrated unsafe behaviour",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}