{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
  "docSlug": "dd91c78f6570bf29",
  "documentTitle": "2023 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2023",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 125,
  "pageCount": 163,
  "prevPage": 124,
  "nextPage": 126,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Part of the 'state of ai 2023' report, specifically the 'Politics' section.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea/125",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea#slide-125",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In other markets, we're either seeing slimmed down national regulation or a preponderance of local laws. While avoiding some of the challenges of major legislation, they also risk pleasing no one.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c4-7719-a22d-1b7d7fc5b84f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.58
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "However, individual US states have been moving to introduce AI laws that vary in strictness. We have mandatory transparency laws around “profiling” and automated decisions in California, Colorado, Texas, Virginia and others. Meanwhile, New York and Illinois have specific laws around the use of AI in hiring decisions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "18b340fc-10b2-4391-847c-596b73fa75d5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The US is unlikely to pass a federal AI law anytime soon and in some respects is pursuing a UK-style approach, with an emphasis on voluntary commitments (e.g. the July White House agreement) and research to establish what constitutes good practice (e.g. the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework). Some of these commitments, for example, involve third party evaluations, but do not specify which third party this would be and the company could theoretically ignore their findings.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "52e01fad-0216-48d1-b494-6b819eea1461",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.73
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Canada is attempting a slimmed down version of the EU AI Act, banning certain and applications and regulating others. Instead of an EU-style sliding scale of obligations, Canada's Artificial Intelligence and Data Act only regulates “high-risk” applications. Enforcement will fall to an existing department, rather than a new regulator.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d03ad98c-addf-4949-bfce-307f4c925e8c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "This approach, however, has been attacked from both sides - with critics accusing it of both going too far or not far enough.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d2d3733c-316a-4ffe-af82-5bbba73e9bb5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "In other markets, we're either seeing slimmed down national regulation or a preponderance of local laws. While avoiding some of the challenges of major legislation, they also risk pleasing no one.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ebf90143-705c-4b20-9e70-88c774f2d0f5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Hybrid models: The best or worst of both worlds?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5ffc98bf-a90f-4975-8283-6109b27176af",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "8dcd9054-a2ff-4132-87a6-c56d027799d0",
      "evidence": "Hybrid models: The best or worst of both worlds?",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 155,
      "from": 121,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-478c8c58938c",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics + Safety sections explore regulatory, geopolitical and risk implications.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 155,
      "from": 121,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-554ec1797b3a",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Climax",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
      "evidence": "Regulatory divergence and the x-risk debate erupt into the mainstream.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 127,
      "from": 122,
      "name": "Segmentation Split",
      "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
      "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-0fbb05f62533",
      "evidence": "Page 122 Venn splits regulators into 3 camps; subsequent slides walk each segment in turn.",
      "position": 12,
      "objective": "Segment the world into distinct regulatory archetypes",
      "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
      "confidence": 82,
      "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}