{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3",
  "docSlug": "bf350dd574c19997",
  "documentTitle": "2021 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2021",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 172,
  "pageCount": 188,
  "prevPage": 171,
  "nextPage": 173,
  "slideType": "problem_statement",
  "function": "frame_problem",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The map is a satirical illustration of fragmented state-level laws, not a factual representation of actual legislation.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "bullet_list",
    "map"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3/172",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3#slide-172",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.48,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The Algorithmic Accountability Act was proposed, and ignored, in 2019. Since then, the US hasn't seen any attempt at a comprehensive national AI regulation or consumer data privacy law.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ef184b9e-0ed4-4f7b-b865-5743a2fb2c9a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The Algorithmic Accountability Act was proposed, and ignored, in 2019. Since then, the US hasn’t seen any attempt at a comprehensive national AI regulation or consumer data privacy law.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c4-7719-a212-4007377300cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.5,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Satirical map of the US showing fragmented, nonsensical state-level laws.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "illustration",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c3a6356a-9fd3-4912-8b88-b89b9dd7b589",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.48,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Existing federal laws are fragmented and sectoral: they partially cover data in specific sensitive domains like health, credit and education, or data on vulnerable populations like children.\nSome laws, like those on surveillance, are outdated and ill-suited to the modern internet. A GDPR-like bill, which covers all online consumer data, would make the legislation clearer for citizens and easier to maintain for legislators.\nMeanwhile, the vast majority of data, including third party data, remains unregulated. Note that the US Constitution doesn't provide for the right to privacy.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "10a2e59b-0e49-4216-9825-ad35298fd7e6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Meanwhile, in the US, there still isn't a federal law protecting consumer data privacy",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dc3c41c1-2ab5-4efa-944c-893658ff39f5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a955-6ace093ab06d",
      "evidence": "Sets US absence against EU/China activity (loop pp.166-174).",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a955-657a8b557902",
      "evidence": "Title 'In the US, there still isn't a federal law…'",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 181,
      "from": 153,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-0cadb21b77bf",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Section 4 Politics: AI Safety, Governance, Regulation, Military implications.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 181,
      "from": 153,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-1e37fb3155df",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Climax",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
      "evidence": "Politics section: ethics firings, AI Act, military AI deployments.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 174,
      "from": 166,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3d-8d98b6afe6d3",
      "evidence": "EU AI Act + sanctions, China PIPL/ethics, US federal vacuum, state-level patchwork.",
      "position": 20,
      "objective": "Contrast EU vs China vs US regulatory approaches",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}