{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3",
  "docSlug": "bf350dd574c19997",
  "documentTitle": "2021 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2021",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 170,
  "pageCount": 188,
  "prevPage": 169,
  "nextPage": 171,
  "slideType": "timeline",
  "function": "establish_context",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 14,
  "notes": "The slide uses a map of China as a background for a chronological timeline of AI ethics initiatives.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "timeline_visual",
    "map",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3/170",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3#slide-170",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "But a practical application of these principles is still lacking, and AI ethics remain subordinated to higher political interests.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c4-7719-a211-c8f6c1477316",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.2,
        "y": 0.4
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Timeline of seminal developments since 2017",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "timeline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "594dd77d-d011-4572-9eab-1e97946e7628",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "AIA = Artificial Intelligence Industry Alliance; AITISA = Artificial Intelligence Industry Technology Innovation Strategic Alliance; BAAI = Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence; CAICT = China Academy of Information and Communications Technology; CESI = Chinese Electronics Standards Institute; MOST = Ministry of Science and Technology; NITS = National Information Technology Standardization Technical Committee; SAC = Standardization Administration of China; TC260 = National Information Technology Standardization Technical Committee; Source: MERICS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "12012b25-a4c4-4dd3-bf2f-e61936e2d1ce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.22,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Leading actors driving each development: Government, Academia, Industry, Civil Society",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cffcf3d3-be7d-48e7-aa16-d167c15b7a48",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Chinese AI actors (government, academia, industry) have long been aware of AI ethics issues. In several papers and initiatives, they outlined principles for building ethical AI systems. But a practical application of these principles is still lacking, and AI ethics remain subordinated to higher political interests.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2eb0283e-397c-4a29-91a0-3dc1616f3761",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "AI ethics in China: numerous initiatives, but to what end?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2c5ae12f-eadb-4dc9-8cc7-23f1167952ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "timeline",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "21274085-7396-4447-ba80-9b37c10fc391",
      "evidence": "Chronological presentation of events from 2017 to 2020.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 181,
      "from": 153,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-0cadb21b77bf",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Section 4 Politics: AI Safety, Governance, Regulation, Military implications.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 78,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 181,
      "from": 153,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-1e37fb3155df",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Climax",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
      "evidence": "Politics section: ethics firings, AI Act, military AI deployments.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 174,
      "from": 166,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3d-8d98b6afe6d3",
      "evidence": "EU AI Act + sanctions, China PIPL/ethics, US federal vacuum, state-level patchwork.",
      "position": 20,
      "objective": "Contrast EU vs China vs US regulatory approaches",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}